Visual Linguistics with R
A practical introduction to quantitative Interactional Linguistics
| University of Freiburg
e-Book – Ordering information
ISBN 9789027260987 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
This book is a textbook on R, a programming language and environment for statistical analysis and visualization. Its primary aim is to introduce R as a research instrument in quantitative Interactional Linguistics. Focusing on visualization in R, the book presents original case studies on conversational talk-in-interaction based on corpus data and explains in good detail how key graphs in the case studies were programmed in R. It also includes task sections to enable readers to conduct their own research and compute their own visualizations in R. Both the code underlying the key graphs in the case studies and the datasets used in the case studies as well as in the task sections are made available on the book’s companion website.
[Not in series, 228] Expected July 2020. ix, 255 pp. + index
Publishing status: In production
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
|
|
Chapter 1. Introduction
|
|
|
Chapter 2. Data management in R
|
|
|
Chapter 3. Graphical parameters
|
|
|
Chapter 4. Location plots
|
|
|
Chapter 5. Barplots
|
|
|
Chapter 6. Dotcharts
|
|
|
Chapter 7. Heatmaps and dendrograms
|
|
|
Chapter 8. Strip charts and violin plots
|
|
|
Chapter 9. Scatter plots
|
|
|
Chapter 10. Association plots and mosaic plots
|
|
|
Chapter 11. Box plots
|
|
|
Chapter 12. Histograms and density plots
|
|
|
Chapter 13. Concluding remarks
|
|
|
References
|
References
References
Aijmer, K.
2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers. A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.
Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C.
2015 Corpus
Pragmatics. A
Handbook. Cambridge: CUP. 
Ameka, F.
1992 Interjections:
The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of
Pragmatics 18: 101–118.
Amerman, J. D. & Parnell, M. M.
1992 Speech
timing strategies in elderly adults. Journal of
Phonetics 20: 65–76.
Atkinson, J. M.
1984 Public
speaking and audience response: Some techniques for inviting
applause. In Structures of
Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), 370–409. Cambridge: CUP.
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. & Johnson, T.
2000 Listeners
as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 79: 941–952.
2002 Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 52: 566–580.
Baynham, M.
2003 Narratives
in space and time: Beyond ‘backdrop’ accounts of narrative
orientation. Narrative
Inquiry 13(2): 347–366.
Beattie, G., Cutler, A. & Pearson, M.
1982 Why
is Mrs. Thatcher interrupted so often?
Nature 300: 744–747.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999 Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Blackwell, N. L., Perlman, M. & Fox
Tree, M. E.
2015 Quotation
as multi-modal construction. Journal of
Pragmatics 81: 1–7.
Boersma, P.
2013 Acoustic
analysis. In Research Methods
in Linguistics, R. J. Podesta & D. Sharma (eds), 375–396. Cambridge: CUP.
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
Bögels, S. & Torreira, F.
2015 Listeners
use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken
interaction. Journal of
Phonetics 52: 46–57.
Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H. & Levinson, S. C.
2015 Never
say no … How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in
conversation. PLoS
ONE 10(12): e0145474.
Bolden, G.
2004 The
quote and beyond: Defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational
Russian. Journal of
Pragmatics 36: 1071–1118.
ten
Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N. & Boves, L.
2005 On
temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational
dialogues. Speech
Communication 47: 80–86.
Brinton, L. J.
2010 Discourse
markers. In Historical
Pragmatics [Handbooks of Pragmatics
8], A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (eds), 285–314. Berlin: D. Gruyter Mouton.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C.
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Buysse, L.
2012 So
as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner
speech. Journal of
Pragmatics 44: 1764–1782. j.pragma.2012.08.012.
Carter, R.
2004 Language
and Creativity. The Art of Common
Talk. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M.
1997 Exploring
Spoken
English. Cambridge: CUP.
Carter, R. A., Hughes, R. & McCarthy, M. J.
2000 Exploring Grammar in Context. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, H. H. & Gerrig, R. J.
1990 Quotations
as
demonstrations. Language 66(4): 764–805.
Clayman, S. E.
2013 Turn-constructional
units and the transition-relevance
place. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 150–166.
Cleveland, W. S.
1979 Robust
locally weighted regression and smoothing
scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical
Association 74: 829–836.
Coleman, J., Baghai-Ravary, L., Pybus, J. & Grau, S.
2012 Audio
BNC. The Audio Edition of the Spoken British National
Corpus. Phonetics Laboratory, University of Oxford. http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/AudioBNC
Coulmas, F.
1985 Direct and indirect speech: General problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 41–63
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
2012 Exploring
affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint
stories. In Emotion in
Interaction, A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (eds), 113–146. Oxford: OUP.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M.
2017 Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Crawley, M. J.
2007 The R book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Crystal, D.
2003 A
Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 5th
edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Culpeper, J.
2011 Impoliteness:
Using Language to Cause
Offence. Cambridge: CUP.
Dalgaard, P.
2008 Introductory
Statistics with R, 2nd
edn. Berlin: Springer.
Diani, G.
2004 The
discourse functions of I don’t know in English
conversation. In Discourse
Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora [Pragmatics & Beyond
New Series 120], K. Aijmer & B. Stenström (eds), 157–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dingemanse, M. & Enfield, N. J.
2014 Let’s
talk: Universal social rules underlie
languages. Scientific American
Mind, 25: 64–69.
Dingemanse, M. & Akita, K.
2017 An
inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the
morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to
Japanese. Journal of
Linguistics 53(3): 501–532.
Dingemanse M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gisladottir, S. R., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Manrique, E., Rossi, G. & Enfield, N.J.
2015 Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136100.
Dingemanse, M., Rossi, G. & Floyd, S.
2017 Place
reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional
affordances. Language in
Society 46(2): 129–158.
Doherty, W.
1997 The
emotional contagion scale: A measure of individual
differences. Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior 21(2): 131–154.
Drew, P.
1998 Complaints
about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 31: 295–325.
2013 Turn
design. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 131–149.
Duncan, S.
1972 Some
signals and rules for taking speaking turns in
conversations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 23: 283–292.
1974 On
the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking
turns. Language in
Society 3: 161–180.
Enfield, N. J.
2017 How we Talk. The Inner Workings of Conversation. New York NY: Basic Books.
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. & Küntay, A.
1997 The
occasioning and structure of conversational stories. In
Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social
Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language
34], T. Givón (ed.),133–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fraser, B.
1990 An
approach to discourse markers. Journal of
Pragmatics 14: 383–395.
Gardner, R.
1998 Between
speaking and listening: The vocalisation of
understandings. Applied
Linguistics 19(2): 204–224.
Goffman, E.
1981 Forms
of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C.
1984 Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), 225-246. Cambridge: CUP.
1986 Between
and within alternative sequential treatments of continuers and
assessments. Human
Studies 9: 205–217.
Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J.
1990 Conversation
analysis. Annual Review of
Anthropology 19: 283–307.
Golato, A.
2000 An
innovative German quotative for reporting embodied actions: Und ich so/und er so ‘and
I’m like/and he’s like’. Journal of
Pragmatics 32: 29–54.
Gries, S. T.
2009 Statistics for Linguistics with R. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2017 Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Gumperz, J. J.
1996 The
linguistic and cultural relativity of
inference. In Rethinking
Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds), 347–406. Cambridge: CUP.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.
1976 Cohesion
in
English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, M. I. M.
2004 A. Introduction
to Functional Grammar, 2nd
edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Haselow, A.
2019 Discourse
marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time
turn production. Journal of
Pragmatics 146: 1–18.
Haugh, M. & Musgrave, S.
2019 Conversational
lapses and laughter: Towards a combinatorial approach to building collections in
conversation analysis. Journal of
Pragmatics 143: 279–291.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. & Rapson, R.
1994 Emotional
Contagion. Cambridge: CUP.
Heldner, M.
2011 Detection thresholds for gaps, overlaps, and no-gaps-no-overlap. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(1): 508–513
Heldner, M. & Edlund, J.
2010 Pauses,
gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of
Phonetics 38: 555–568.
Heritage, J.
1984 A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action, J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.
1998 Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27(3): 291–334.
1999 Conversation
analysis at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-Interaction, their distributions, and
their outcomes. Research on Language & Social
Interaction 32(1–2): 69–76.
2015 Well-prefaced
turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic
perspective. Journal of
Pragmatics 88: 88–104.
Heritage. J.
2013 Turn-initial
position and some of its occupants. Journal of
Pragmatics 57: 331–337.
Heritage, J.
2018 Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of of and well. In Between Turn and Sequence. Turn-initial Particles across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31], J. Heritage & M. L. Sorjonen (eds), 155–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heritage, J. & Sorjonen, M. L.
2018 Analyzing turn-initial particles. In Between Turn and Sequence. Turn-initial Particles across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31], J. Heritage & M. L. Sorjonen (eds), 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hilpert, M.
2011 Dynamic visualizations of language change. Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 435–461.
Hoey, M.
2005 Lexical Priming. A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
Hoey, E. M.
2015 Lapses:
How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in
talk. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 48(4): 430–453.
2017 Sequence
recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in
conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics 109: 47–63.
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. & Berglund
Prytz, Y.
2008 Corpus
Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical
Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Holler, J. & Levinson, S. C.
2019 Multimodal
language processing in human communication. Trends in
Cognitive
Sciences 23(8): 639–652.
Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H. & Levinson, S. C.
2018 Processing
language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster
responses. Psychonometric Bulletin
Review 25: 1900–1918.
Holler, J., Shovelton, H. & Beattie, G.
2009 Do
iconic gestures really contribute to the semantic information communicated in
face-to-face interaction? Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior 33: 73–88.
Hömke, P., Holler, J. & Levinson, S. C.
2017 Eye
blinking as addressee feedback in face-to-face
conversation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 50(1): 54–70.
Holt, E.
1996 Reporting
talk: The use of direct reported speech in
conversation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 29(3): 219–245.
2000 Reporting
and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported
speech. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 33(4): 425–454.
2007 ‘I’m
eying your chop up mind’: Reporting and
enacting. In Reporting Talk.
Reported Speech in Interaction, E. Holt & R. Clift (eds), 47–80. Cambridge: CUP.
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. M.
2004 The
spatial and temporal signatures of word production
components. Cognition 92: 101–144.
Jaeger, T. F.
2010 Redundancy
and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information
density. Cognitive
Psychology 61(1): 23–62.
Jakobson, R.
1960 Linguistics
and poetics. In Style in
Language, T. A. Sebeok (ed.), 351–377. Cambridge, MA: The MI. Press.
Jefferson, G.
1973 A
case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address
terms in closing
sequences. Semiotics 9: 47–96.
1978 Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Studies in the Organization of Conversatonal Interaction, J. Schenkein (ed.), 219–248. New York NY: Academic Press.
1979 A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In Everyday Language – Studies in Ethnomethodology, G. Psathas (ed.), 79–95. New York NY: Irvington Publishers.
1984 On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (ed.), 191–222. Cambridge: CUP.
1986 Notes
on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human
Studies 9: 153–183.
2004 Glossary
of transcript symbols with an
introduction. In Conversation
Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, G. H. Lerner (ed.), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A.
1987 Notes
on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy, G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds), 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jescheniak, J. D. & Levelt, W. J. M.
1994 Word
frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of
phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and
Cognition 20: 824–843.
Johnson, K.
2013 Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Kaltenböck, G.
2015 Processibility. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (eds.), 117–142. Cambridge: CUP.
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A. & Maris, E.
2010 Two
sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance
comprehension. Psychological
Science 21(2): 260–267.
Kendon, A.
1967 Some
functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta
Psychologica 26: 22–63.
1986 Some
reasons for studying
gesture. Semiotica 62(1–2): 3–28.
Kendrick, K. & Drew, P.
2016 Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 1–19.
Koester, A. & Handford, M.
2018 It’s
not good saying “Well it it might do that or it might not”’: Hypothetical reported
speech in business meetings. Journal of
Pragmatics 130: 67–80.
Labov, W.
1972 Language
in the Inner
City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Labov, W. & Waletzky. J.
1967/1997 Narrative
analysis: Oral versions of personal
experience. In Essays on the
Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helms (ed.), 12–44. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative
Inquiry and Life History 7(1–4): 3–38.
Leech, G.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S.
1999 A
theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral
and Brain
Sciences 22(1): 1–38.
Levinson, S. C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
2013 Action
formation and
ascription. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 103–130.
2016 Turn-taking
in human communication–Origins and implications for language
processing. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 20(1): 6–14.
Levinson S. C. & Holler, J.
2014 The
origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society
B 369: 20130302.
Levinson, S. C. & Torreira, F.
2015 Timing
in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of
language. Frontiers in
Psychology 6: 731.
Levshina, N.
2015 How
to do Linguistics with R. Data Exploration and Statistical
Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Liebenthal, E., Silbersweig, D. A. & Stern, E.
2016 The
language, tone and prosody of emotions: Neural substrates and dynamics of spoken-word
emotion perception. Frontiers of
Neuroscience 10: 506.
Liddicoat, A. J.
2007 A. Introduction
to Conversation
Analysis. London: Continuum.
Local, J., & Walker, G.
2012 How
phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the
International Phonetic
Association 42: 255–280.
Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., de
Ruiter, J. P. & Levinson, S. C.
2014 Early
anticipation lies behind the speed of response in
conversation. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience 26(11): 2530–2539.
Mathis, T. & Yule, G.
1994 Zero
quotatives. Discourse
Processes 18(1): 63–76.
Mayes, P.
1990 Quotation
in spoken English. Studies in
Language 14: 325–363.
McCarthy, M.
2003 Talking
back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday
conversation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 36(1): 33–63.
McIntyre, D., Bellard
Thomson, C., Heywood, J., McEnery, T., Semino, E. & Short, M.
2004 Investigating
the presentation of speech, writing and thought in spoken British English: A
corpus-based approach. ICAME Journal
28: 49–76.
Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramirez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B. & Pennebaker, J. W.
2007 Are
women really more talkative than
men? Science 317: 82.
Müller, F. E.
1996 Affiliating
and disaffiliating with continuers: prosodic aspects of
recipiency. In Prosody in
Conversation, E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds), 131–176. Cambridge: CUP.
Norrick, N.
2009 Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 866–891.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A.
(eds) 1996 Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M. & Hoey, M.
2012 Exploring
text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper
corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic
Theory 8(1): 73–101.
Ogden, R.
2001 Turn
transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish
talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International
Phonetic
Association 31(1): 139–152.
O’Keeffe, A. & Adolphs, S.
2008 Response
tokens in British and Irish discourse. Corpus, context and variational
pragmatics. In Variational
Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
178], K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (eds), 69–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peräkylä, A., Henttonen, P., Voutilainen, L., Kahri, M., Stevanovic, M., Sams, M. & Ravaja, N.
2015 Sharing
the emotional load: Recipient affiliation calms down the
storyteller. Social Psychology
Quarterly 78(4): 301–323.
Pomerantz, A. M.
1984 Agreeing
and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn
shapes. In Structures of Social
Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.
Pomerantz, A. & Heritage, J.
2013 Preference. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 210–228.
Prince, E. F.
1981 Toward
a taxonomy of given/new
information. In Radical
Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985 A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Rayson, P., Leech, G. & Hodges. M.
1997 Social
differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational
component of the British National Corpus. International
Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 2(1): 133–152.
Riest, C., Jorschnik, A. B. & de Ruiter, J. P.
2015 Anticipation in turn-taking: Mechanisms and information sources. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–14.
Riggenbach, H.
1991 Toward
an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker
conversations. Discourse
Processes 14: 423–441.
Roberts, S. G. & Levinson, S. C.
2017 Conversation,
cognition and cultural evolution: A model of the cultural evolution of word order
through pressures imposed from turn takingin
conversation. Interaction
Studies 18(3): 402–429.
Roberts, S. G., Torreira, F. & Levinson, S. C.
2015 The
effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking: A corpus
study. Frontiers of
Psychology 6: 509.
Rochemont, M. & Cullicover, P.
1990 English
Focus Constructions and the Theory of
Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Romero-Trillo, J.
2018 Prosodic modeling and position analysis of pragmatic markers in English conversation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.
Rühlemann, C.
2013 Narrative
in English Conversation. A Corpus
Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
2017 Integrating
corpus-linguistic and conversation-analytic transcription in XML. The case of
backchannels and overlap in storytelling
interaction. Corpus
Pragmatics 1(3): 201–232.
2018a Corpus
Linguistics for
Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
2018b TCU-initial
backchannel overlap in storytelling. Narrative
Inquiry 28(2): 257–279.
2018c How
long does it take to say ‘well’? Evidence from the Audio
BNC. Corpus
Pragmatics 3(1): 49–66.
Forthcoming
a. What dialog is absent from constructed
dialog? English Text
Construction.
Forthcoming
b. Turn structure and
inserts. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics.
Rühlemann, C. & Dingemanse, M.
In
preparation. Response time for
backchannels.
Rühlemann, C. & Gee, M.
2017 Conversation analysis and the XML method. Gesprächsforschung 18: 274–296
Rühlemann, C. & Gries, S. T.
Under
review. Speakers advance-project turn completion by
slowing down – A multifactorial corpus study.
Rühlemann, C. & Hilpert, M.
2017 Colloquialization
in journalistic writing: Investigating inserts in TIME magazine with a focus on
well. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 18(1): 102–135.
Rühlemann, C. & Schweinberger, M.
In
preparation. Nucleus placement – A multifactorial corpus
analysis.
Rühlemann, C. & O’Donnell, M.B.
2012 Introducing a corpus of conversational narratives. Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(2): 313–350.
Rühlemann, C., Bagoutdinov, A. & O’Donnell, M. B.
2015 Modest
XPath and XQuery for corpora: Exploiting deep XML
annotation. ICAM. Journal 39: 47–84.
de
Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H. & Enfield, N. J.
2006 Projecting
the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of
conversation. Language 82(3): 515–535.
Sacks, H.
1984 Notes
on methodology. In Structures
of Social Action, J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds), 21–27. Cambridge: CUP.
1987 On
the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in
conversation. In Talk and
Social Organisation, G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds). Clevendon:
Multilingual Matters.
1992 Lectures
on Conversation, Vols. I &
II. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G.
1974 A
simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for
conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.
Scott, M. & Tribble, C.
2006 Textual
Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language
Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics
22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schegloff, E. A.
1982 Discourse
as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come
between
sentences. In Georgetown
University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics Analyzing Discourse: Text and
Talk, D. Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
1993 Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 99–128.
1996 Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds), 53–133. Cambridge: CUP.
2000 Overlapping
talk and the organization of turn-taking for
conversation. Language in
Society 29: 1–63.
2001 Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds), 229–249. Oxford: Blackwell.
2007 Sequence
Organisation in Interaction: A Primer in
Conversation-Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, E. A. & Lerner, G. H.
2009 Beginning
to respond: “well”-prefaced responses to
WH-questions. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 42(2): 91–115.
Schiffrin, D.
1985 Conversational coherence: The role of well. Language 61: 640–667.
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.
Schleppgrell, M.
1991 Paratactic
because. Journal of
Pragmatics 16: 323–337.
Schourup, L.
2001 Rethinking
well. Journal of
Pragmatics 33: 1025–1060.
Searle, J. R.
1975 Indirect
speech acts. In Syntax and
Semantics III, P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds), 59–82. New York NY: Academic Press.
Sidnell, J.
2006 Coordinating
gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 39(4): 377–409.
Sinclair, J. M.
2000 Lexical
grammar. Naujoji
Metodologija 24: 191–203.
Soulaimani, D.
2018 Talk,
voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated
approach. Discourse
Studies 20(3): 361–376.
Stec, K., Huiskes, M. & Redeker, G.
2016 Multimodal
quotation: Role shift practices in spoken
narratives. Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 1–17.
Stivers, T.
2008 Stance,
alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of
affiliation. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41(1): 31–57.
2013 Sequence
organization. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 191–209.
2015 Coding
social interaction: A heretical approach in Conversation
Analysis? Research on Language and Social
Interaction 48(1): 1–19.
Stivers, T. & Robinson, J. D.
2006 A
preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in
Society 35: 367–392.
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, T.
2013 Introduction. In Sidnell & Stivers (eds), 1–8.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de
Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E. & Levinson, S. C.
2009 Universals
and cultural variation in turn-taking in
conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of the
Sciences
U.S.A. 106(26): 10587–10592.
Stokoe, E.
2018 Talk: The Science of Conversation. London: Robinson.
Stubbs, M.
2002 Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Stubblebine, T.
2007 Regular Expression, 2nd edn. Sebastopol CA: O’Reilly.
Tognini
Bonelli, E.
2010 The
evolution of corpus
linguistics. In The Routledge
Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 14–27. London: Routledge.
Torreira, F., Bögels, S. & Levinson, S. C.
2015 Breathing
for answering: The time course of response planning in
conversation. Frontiers in
Psychology.
Vachek, J.
(ed.) 1964 A
Prague School Reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Vatanen, A.
2018 Responding in early overlap: Recognitional onsets in assertion sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
Wade, E. & Clark, H. H.
1993 Reproduction
and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and
Language 32(6): 805–819.
Wald, B.
1983 Referents and topic within and across discourse units: Observations from current vernacular English. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, F. Klein-Andreu (ed.), 91–116. New York NY: Academic Press.
Wells, B. & Macfarlane, S.
1998 Prosody
as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and
overlap. Language and
Speech 41(3–4): 265–294.
Wennerstrom, A.
2001 The
Music of Everyday Speech. Prosody and Discourse
Analysis. Oxford: OUP.
Wesseling, W. & van
Son, R. J. J. H.
2005 Timing
of experimentally elicited minimal responses as quantitative evidence for the use of
intonation in projecting
trps. Interspeech 6: 3389–3392.
White, S.
1989 Backchannels
across cultures: A study of Americans and
Japanese. Language in
Society 18(1): 59–76.
Wong, D. & Peters, P.
2007 A
study of backchannels in regional varieties of English, using corpus mark-up as the
means of identification. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 12(4): 479–509.
Woods, A., Fletcher, P. & Hughes A.
1986 Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: CUP.
Yngve, V.
1970 On
getting a word in
edgewise. In Papers from the
Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert
I. Binnick (ed.), 567–77. Chicago IL: CLS.
Yuan, J., Liberman, M. & Cieri, C.
2006 Towards
an integrated understanding of speaking rate in
conversation. Interspeech 2006.
Zipf, G. K.
1949 Human
Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. A. Introduction to Human
Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFX – Computational linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General