Article published in:
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 189202
References

References

Bierwisch, M.
(1972) Schriftstruktur und Phonologie [Writing structure and phonology]. Probleme und Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 43, 21–44.Google Scholar
Carney, E.
(1994) A survey of English spelling. London, New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, J.
(1971) Nederlands etymologisch woordenboek [Dutch etymological dictionary]. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, P.
(1988) Über die Autonomie der graphematischen Analyse [On the autonomy of graphematic analysis]. In D. Nerius & G. Augst (Eds.), Probleme der geschriebenen Sprache (pp. 25–35).Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften (Linguistische Studien Reihe A 173).Google Scholar
(2006). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik[A sketch of German grammar]. Band 1, Das Wort (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N.
(2005) Orthografie [Orthography]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gallmann, P.
(1986) The graphic elements of German written language. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 43–79). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heemskerk, J.S.M., & Van Heuven, V.J.
(1993) MORPA, a MORphological PArser for a Dutch text-to-speech system. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation (pp. 67–85). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L.M.
(1977) On the nature of linguistic stress. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4, 37–92.Google Scholar
Kager, R., & Zonneveld, W.
(1986) Schwa, syllables and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 5, 197–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neef, M.
(2005) Die Graphematik des Deutschen [German graphematics]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4, 214–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H.
(2003)  Verpleegsters, ambassadrices and masseuses. Stratum differences in the comprehension of Dutch words with feminine agent suffixes. In P. Fikkert & L. Cornips (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003 (pp. 117–127)Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, A.M.
(1998) Dutch orthography: A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Nunn, A., & Van Heuven, V.J.
(1993) MORPHON: Lexicon-based text-to-phoneme conversion and phonological rules. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation, (pp. 87–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R.
(2000) A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, P.A.F., & Van der Sijs, N.
(1990) Etymologisch woordenboek, de herkomst van onze woorden [Etymological dictionary, the origin of our words]. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, V.J., Neijt, A.H., & Hijzelendoorn, M.
(1994) Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters [Automatic classification of Dutch words on the basis of etymological filters]. Spektator, 23(4), 279–291.Google Scholar
Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O.
(1990) Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Wijk, N.
(1980 [1912]) Franck’s etymologisch woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Franck’s etymological dictionary of the Dutch language]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Venezky, R.
(1970) The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The American way of spelling. New York/London: Guilford.Google Scholar
Weingarten, R.
(2011) Comparative graphematics. In S.R. Borgwaldt & T. Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuidema, J., & Neijt, A.
(2012) Verkennend onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid en de haalbaarheid van een verrijking van de Woordenlijst Nederlandse Taal ten behoeve van spellingonderwijs. Rapport in opdracht van de Nederlandse Taalunie [An exploratory investigation of the advisability and feasibility of an enrichment of the official Dutch spelling for the benefit of spelling education. Report by order of the Dutch Language Union]. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Retrievable from http://​taalunieversum​.org​/sites​/tuv​/files​/downloads​/rapport%20VWS%2015022013​.pdfGoogle Scholar