Article published in:
Orthographic Databases and Lexicons
Edited by Lynne Cahill and Terry Joyce
[Written Language & Literacy 20:1] 2017
► pp. 5279
References

References

Assink, Egbert M. H., Caroline Vooijs & Paul P. N. A. Knuijt
(2000) Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data. Reading and Writing 12, 149–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeksma, Merijn, Anneke Neijt & Johan Zuidema
(2016) Shotgun: converting words into triplets. A hybrid approach to grapheme-phoneme conversion in Dutch. Written Language and Literacy 19, 157–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert E. (1987) The reflection of linguistic structure in Dutch spelling. In P. A. Luelsdorff (ed.), Orthography and Phonology, 215–224. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borgwaldt, Susanne R. & Annette M. B. de Groot
(2002) Beyond the rime – Measuring the consistency of monosyllabic and polysyllabic words. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language, 49–69. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Frauke M. Hellwig & Annette M. B. de Groot
(2005) Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 18: 211–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T., Janet G. van Hell & Ludo Verhoeven
(2006) Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 98, 879–890. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T., & Guy Van Orden
(1997) Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Riebel, & M. Fayol (eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages, 173–194. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dick H. M.
(1993) Op weg naar effectief spellingonderwijs. [Towards effective spelling education]. Hoevelaken: CPS Primair Onderwijsreeks.Google Scholar
Carney, Edward
(1994) A Survey of English Spelling. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cranshoff, Betty & Johan Zuidema
(2004–2008) Zin in Spelling [Fancy Spelling]. Tilburg: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
(2005, 2010) Van Dale Basisspellinggids. Utrecht & Antwerpen: Van Dale, Tilburg: Zwijsen (first and second edition).Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
(2002) Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal ( cd-rom, version 1.0 Plus).Google Scholar
Hanssen, Esther, Robert Schreuder & Anneke Neijt
(2015) From t-bias to d-bias. Evidence from children’s spelling and pronunciation. Written Language and Literacy 18, 104–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heuven, Vincent van, Anneke Neijt & Maarten Hijzelendoorn
(1994) Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters. Spektator 23, 279–291.Google Scholar
Keuning, Jos & Ludo Verhoeven
(2008) Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences 18, 459–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kraak, Albert
(2006) Homo loquens en homo scribens. Over natuur en cultuur bij de taal. [Homo loquens and homo scribens. Nature and culture in language.] Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neef, Martin
(2005) Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
(2002) The interfaces of writing and grammar. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 11–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke, Mijntje Peters & Johan Zuidema
(2012) The 12321 model of Dutch spelling acquisition. In Marion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012, 111–122. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb
(2007) Alphabetics. From phonemes to letters or from letters to phonemes? Written Language and Literacy 10, 129–143.Google Scholar
Notenboom, Annelise & Pieter Reitsma
(2007) Spelling Dutch Doublets: Children’s Learning of a Phonological and Morphological Spelling Rule’, Scientific Studies of Reading 11, 133–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Anneke Marijke
(1998) Dutch orthography. A Systematic Investigation of the Spelling of Dutch Words. PhD Dissertation. LOT dissertation series 6. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics. http://​webdoc​.ubn​.ru​.nl​/mono​/n​/nunn​_a​/dutcor​.pdf
Peters, Mijntje
in preparation). PhD-thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
(1999) Lists of words and activities for the KS2 spelling objectives. Department for education and employment, London. http://​dera​.ioe​.ac​.uk​/4831/
Sproat, Richard
(2000) A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘The consistency of the orthographically relevant level in Dutch’. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.). The relation of writing to spoken language. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 35–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, Richard L. S.
(1999) The American way of spelling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Verhaert, Nina, Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
(2016) The dual role of homophone dominance : why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. Mental lexicon 11, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woordenlijst
(2015) Woordenlijst van de Nederlandse Taal. De Taalunie, ’s Gravenhage. http://​woordenlijst​.org​/leidraad.
Zonneveld, Wim
(1980) Autonome spelling. De nieuwe taalgids 73, 518–536.Google Scholar
Zuidema, Johan & Anneke Neijt
(2012) Verkennend onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid en de haalbaarheid van een verrijking van de Woordenlijst Nederlandse Taal ten behoeve van spellingonderwijs. [Exploratory study of the desirability and feasibility of enrichment of the spelling dictionary for the benefit of spelling instruction]. By assignment of the Nederlandse Taalunie. http://​taalunieversum​.org​/sites​/tuv​/files​/downloads​/rapport%20VWS%2015022013​.pdf