Chapter published in:
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 579620
References

References

Adelaar, Alexander
2005The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia: Introduction. In Voice Variation in Austronesian Languages of Indonesia, Alexander Adelaar (ed.), 1–3. Jakarta: NUSA.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2004aAntipassive and specificity in Tagalog. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of AFLA 11, Paul Law (ed.), 1–14. Berlin: Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie, und Universalienforschung.Google Scholar
2004bErgativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
2008Phase-based account of extraction in Indonesian. Lingua 118(10): 1440–1469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 331–345. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Antipassive and ergativity in Tagalog. Lingua 122(3): 192–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arka, I Wayan
2017The core-oblique distinction in some Austronesian languages of Indonesia and beyond. Linguistik Indonesia 35(2): 100–142.Google Scholar
Arka, I. Wayan & Ross, Malcolm
(eds) 2005The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter
2013Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, rev. edn. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Berge, Anna
2011Topic and Discourse Structure in West Greenlandic Agreement Constructions. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1987On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(2): 194–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1917Tagalog Texts with Grammatical Analysis: List of Formations and Glossary [University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 2–4]. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert
2006The origin of the Kelabit voiced aspirates: A historical hypothesis revisited. Oceanic Linguistics 45(2): 311–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brainard, Sherri
1994Voice and ergativity in Karao. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 365–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cheryl
1983Topic continuity in written English narrative. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Linguistic Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 313–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1980The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clayre, Beatrice
2005Kelabitic languages and the fate of ‘focus’: Evidence from the Kerayan. In The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies, I. Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross (eds), 17–57. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2014A preliminary typology of the languages of Middle Borneo. In Advances in Research on Cultural and Linguistic Practices in Borneo, Peter Sercombe, Michael Boutin & Adrian Clynes (eds), 123–151. Phillips, Maine ME: Borneo Research Council.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Gabriella Hermon
2008Voice in Malay/Indonesian. Lingua 118(10): 1500–1553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1988Passive and voice. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 9–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1987Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro Narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 16], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann, Fox, Barbara A. & Givón, Talmy
1984The discourse definition of ergativity. Studies in Language 8(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina
2011Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, François
1983An aspectual distinction in Tagalog. Oceanic Linguistics 22(1–2): 175–206.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drossard, Werner
1984Das Tagalog als Repräsentant des aktivischen Sprachbaus. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Foley, William A.
2008The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, Peter K. Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds), 22–44. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van ValinJr., Robert D.
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gault, JoAnn Marie
1999An Ergative Description of Sama Bangingiʼ. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B.
1988Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis. In Studies in Austronesian Linguistics, Richard McGinn (ed.), 295–321. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(ed.) 1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1994Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The Story of Zero. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, Charlotte
2015Kelabit voice: Philippine-type, Indonesian-type or something a bit different? Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 383–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The Kelabit Language, Austronesian Voice and Syntactic Typology. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
2017Documentation of the Kelabit Language, Sarawak, Malaysia. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2196​/00​-0000​-0000​-000F​-B667​-4. Accessed on 02/01/2021
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1991The Philippine challenge to universal grammar. University of Köln Working Papers 15.Google Scholar
2005aThe Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 110–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005bTagalog. In The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Alfred B.
1978Linguistic relations among Bornean peoples with special reference to Sarawak: An interim report. Studies in Third World Societies 3: 1–44.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD Dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Ivan
1979The antipassive and grammatical relations in Eskimo. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 117–143. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katagiri, Masumi
2005Voice, ergativity and transitivity in Tagalog and other Philippine languages: A typological perspective. In The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies, I. Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross (eds), 153–174. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2009Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35(1): 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Lexical category and alignment in Austronesian. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds), 589–628. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew
2007Passive in the world’s languages. In Clause Structure, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 325–361. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko
2017Ergativity and Language Change in Austronesian Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R.
1993aAnother look at subjecthood in Tagalog. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 24(2): 1–15.Google Scholar
1993bPhrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latrouite, Anja
2011Voice and Case in Tagalog: The Coding of Prominence and Orientation. PhD dissertation, University of Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
2014Event-structural prominence and forces in verb meaning shifts. In Causation in Grammatical Structure, Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 372–428. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latrouite, Anja & Van ValinJr., Robert D.
2014Referentiality and telicity in Lakhota and Tagalog. In Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs, Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite & Albert Ortmann (eds), 401–426. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Hsiu-chuan
2004Transitivity and Ergativity in Formosan and Philippine Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. & Sag, Ivan A.
1998Argument structure, valence, and binding. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 107–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Peter W.
1996A comparative ethnolinguistic survey of the Murut (Lun Bawang) with special reference to Brunei. In Language Use and Language Change in Brunei Darussalam, Peter W. Martin, Conrad Oz̊óg & Gloria Poedjosoedarmo (eds), 268–279. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1994The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Antipassive propensities and alignment. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori
2009The middle voice in Tagalog. Journal of the South East Asian Linguistics Society 1: 159–188.Google Scholar
Needham, Stephanie & Ida Toivonen
2011Derived arguments. In Proceedings of the LFG11 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 401–421. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nolasco, Ricardo M.
2005What Philippine ergativity really means. Taiwan-Japan Joint Workshop on Austronesian Languages, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 23–24 June.
O’Brien, Colleen
2016Are Philippine languages ergative? Evidence from Western Subanon. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa: Working Papers in Linguistics 47(2): 1–15.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1994The pragmatics of voice in a Philippine language: Actor-focus and goal-focus in Cebuano narrative. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 317–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2005Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 438–441. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea & Richards, Norvin
2005Phase edge extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 565–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
2009Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. In Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds), 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1988Ergative, passive, and antipassive in Nez Perce: A discourse perspective. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], 547–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saclot, Maureen Joy
2006On the transitivity of the actor focus and patient focus constructions in Tagalog. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Palawan, Philippines.
2011Event structure in Tagalog. PhD dissertation, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 491–518. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Lawrence A. Reid
2008Tagalog. In The World’s Major Languages, Bernard Comrie (ed.), 833–855. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Bodil Kappel
2003West Greenlandic antipassive. Nordlyd 31(2): 385–399.Google Scholar
Smith, Alexander D.
2017The Languages of Borneo: A Comprehensive Classification. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2010On the conditions for antipassives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7): 556–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
2009 [1997]Formosan clause structure: transitivity, ergativity, and case marking. In Formosan Linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s Contributions, Elizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), 657–680. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academica Sinica.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley, Pawley, Andrew & Reid, Lawrence A.
1982The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Stephen A. Wurm & Lois Carrington (eds), 145–170. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], 595–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Dennis
1994Discourse-based evidence for an ergative analysis of Cebuano. UTA Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 127–140.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C.
1975Ergativity of Grammatical Processes: A Study of Greenlandic Eskimo. MA thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Teng, Stacy F.
2016Reassessing the position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 55(1): 162–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.