Chapter published in:
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 427446
References

References

Bauman, James John
1975Pronouns and Pronominal Morphology in Tibeto-Burman. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent
2014Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H.
1992A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2004Hidden syntax in Belhare. In Himalayan Languages: Past and Present, Anju Saxena (ed.), 141–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Multivariate typology and field linguistics: A case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds), 3–13. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin
2015First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Gaenzle, Martin, Rai, Arjun, Shoj Rai, Prem, Kumar Rai, Shree, Rai, Vishnu & Sharma, Narayan P.
2007Two ways of suspending object agreement in Puma: Between incorporation, antipassivization, and optional agreement. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 7: 1–19.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 49–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2012The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. Presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm, 29 August-1 September. http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-West​_Mande​_antipassives​.pdf (10 August 2020).
Creissels, Denis & Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie
2008Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of co-participation. In Reciprocal and Reflexives, Theoretical and Typological Explanations, Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds), 289–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2013The origins of Sinitic. In Increased Empricism: Recent Advances in Chinese Linguistics [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 2], Zhou Jing-Schmidt (ed.), 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. W. M.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius
2009A Grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, Paradigm Tables, Glossary and Texts of a Rai Language of Eastern Nepal. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Downer, Gordon B.
1959Derivation by tone-change in Classical Chinese. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 22(1–3): 258–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
1987A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54(3): 520–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993aA Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993bThe Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 61(2): 292–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2007A Grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges
1954Comment reconstruire le chinois archaïque. Word 10: 351–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Christian
2013Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, Nathan W. Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds), 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2012aArgument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Ergativity, Valency and Voice, Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds), 199–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bFrom denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11): 1207–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The origin of the causative prefix in Rgyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica 36(1): 165–198.Google Scholar
2016How many *-s suffixes in Old Chinese? Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 9(2): 205–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aA reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 38: 177–215.Google Scholar
2017bJaphug. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd edn, Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 614–634. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Antonov, Anton, Lai, Yunfan & Nima, Lobsang
2017Stau (Ergong, Horpa In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd edn, Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 597–613. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Chen, Zhen
2007茶堡话的不及物前缀及相关问题. Language and Linguistics 8(4): 883–912.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Lahaussois, Aimée & Bahadur Rai, Dhan
2016Reflexive paradigms in Khaling. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39(1): 33–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
2016L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Brussels: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kathol, Andreas & VanBik, Kenneth
2001The syntax of verbal alternations in Lai. Presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Lahaussois, Aimée
2016Reflexive derivations in Thulung. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 39(1): 49–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2013La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. MA thesis, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
To appear. The denominal origin of causative and passive derivations in Rgyalrongic languages. In Voice Systems in Diachrony: A Comparative Perspective, Michela Cennamo ed. Amsterdam John Benjamins
LaPolla, Randy
2000Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 282–311. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy & Yang, Jiangling
2004Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong/Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics 2: 1–13.Google Scholar
Mang, Kee Shein
2006A Syntactic and Pragmatic Description of Verb Stem Alternation in K’cho, a Chin Language. MA thesis, Payap University.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Mazaudon, Martine, Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume, Séverine, François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 8: 119–135.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean-Robert
2004A Grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Peterson, David
2003Hakha Lai. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 409–426. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2007Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 172–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Say, Sergey S.
2008K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: Semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis. PhD dissertation, Rossijskaja akademija nauk, Institut lingvisticheskix issledovanij, St-Petersburg.
Schackow, Diana
2015A Grammar of Yakkha [Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7]. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schikowski, Robert, Bickel, Balthasar & Paudyal, Netra P.
2015Flexible valency in Chintang. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 669–708. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
So-Hartmann, Helga
2009A Descriptive Grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley CA: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2006 Jiāróngyǔ dòngcí de pàishēng xíngtài 嘉戎語動詞的派生形態 (Derivational morphology in the Rgyalrong verb). Minzu yuwen 民族語文 4(3): 3–14.Google Scholar
2014Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 630–650. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Takashima, Ken-ichi
2013A few morphological functions of the suffix *-s in Shang Chinese. In Eastward Flows the Great River: Festschrift in Honor of Professor William S. Wang, Gang Peng & Feng Shi (eds), 355–373. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Tolsma, Gerard Jacobus
2006A Grammar of Kulung. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996L’ergativité en tibétain. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Turin, Mark
2012A Grammar of the Thangmi Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Watters, David E.
2002A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2014A Descriptive Grammar of Bunan. PhD dissertation, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Willis, Christina Marie
2007A Descriptive Grammar of Darma: An Endangered Tibeto-Burman Language. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
2016La phonologie et la morphologie du dialecte de Bragdbardu rgyalrong situ. MA thesis, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Janic, Katarzyna
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Say, Sergey
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.