Chapter published in:
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 139
References

References

Adamou, Evangelia
2014L’antipassif en ixcatèque. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 109(1): 373–396.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2011Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 331–345. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Antipassive and ergativity in Tagalog. Lingua 122(3): 192–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Letuchiy, Alexander
2008Derivacii antipassivnoj zony v adygejskom jazyke. In Issledovanija po otglagol’noj derivacii, Vladmir Plungian & Sergey Tatevosov (eds), 77–102. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
2021Indirect antipassive in Circassian. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auderset, Sandra. The antipassive and its relationship to person markers
2021Polyfunctional vanka- in Nivaĉle and the antipassive category. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Matthew
2011Studies in Inuktitut Grammar. PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Beaudoin-Lietz, Christa
1982Aspects of Certain Intransitivizing Postbases of a Transitivizing Postbase in Labrador Inuttut. MA dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Beck, David
2000Semantic agents, syntactic subjects, and discourse topics: How to locate Lushotseed sentences in space and time. Studies in Language 24(2): 277–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2011Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin
2015First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1987On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(2): 1–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bokarev, Evgenij A.
1949Sintaksis avarskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1982Der präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In Festschrift für Johannes Hubschmid zum 65. Geburtstag, Otto Winkelmann & Maria Braisch (eds), 579–599. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
1985Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Brainard, Sherri
1994Voice and ergativity in Karao. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 365–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, Victoria
1978Antipassives constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, Nora C. England (ed.), 3–24. New York NY: Museum of Anthropology, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Budd, Peter
2014Partitives in Oceanic languages. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 523–562. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna
2021Unspecified participant: A case of antipassive in Ainu. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2000Valency-changing derivations in K’iche’. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 236–281. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jean Ormsbee
1993A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra
1998The Design of Agreement. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1993Argument structure. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 905–914. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Khalilov, Madzhid & Khalilova, Zaira
2015Valency and valency classes in Bezhta. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1: Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 541–570. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana, Khalilova, Zaira & van den Berg, Helma
2021Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages: Exploring the margins of a construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1988The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann, Fox, Barbara A. & Talmy Givón
1984The discourse definition of ergativity. Studies in Language 8(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Syntaxe générale: une introduction typologique. Vol. 2, La phrase. Paris: Hermès ScienceGoogle Scholar
2016Transitivity, valency and voice. Manuscript presented at the European Summer School in Linguistic Typology, Porquerolles. http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-ESSLT​.pdf> (5 August 2020).
2021Antipassive derivation in Soninke (West Mande). In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
To appear. A sketch of Mandinka. In The Oxford Guide to the Atlantic Languages of West Africa, Friederike Lüpke ed. Oxford OUP
Creissels, Denis & Biaye, Séckou
2016Le balant ganja. Dakar: IFAN Cheikh Anta Diop.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon P.
1985Tzutujil Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denniss, Jessica
2021Aspect and modality in Pama-Nyungan antipassives. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Peter
2006Case markedness. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. London: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977A Grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000Introduction. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael J.
1999A Grammar of Chukchi. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
England, Nora C.
1983A Grammar of Mam, a Mayan Language. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1988Mam voice. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 525–545. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
1992Semantic relations vs. abstract syntactic relations: Evidence from Halkomelem. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Laura A. Buszard-Welcher, Jonathan Evans, David Peterson, Lionel Wee & William Weigel (eds), 76–87. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2005Grammatical Relations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W.
2006Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30: 541–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A.
2007A typology of information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 362–446. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forker, Diana
2012The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 75–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D.
1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie, Goncalves, Michael, Polinsky, Maria & Radkevich, Nina
2014The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez. Lingua 150: 137–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1987The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B.
1988Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis. In Studies in Austronesian Linguistics, Richard McGinn (ed.), 295–321. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E.
2005Multiple antipassives in Halkomelem Salish. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Andrew K. Simpson (ed.), 51–62. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2006The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics 48: 44–81.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane & Mester, Armin
1985Complex verb formation in Eskimo. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.
1981Sk’op Sotz’leb: El Tzotzil de San Lorenzo Zinacantan. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery 12(2): 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Müller-Bardey, Thomas
2004Valence change. In Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung [Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft = Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 17.2], Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 1130–1145. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D.
2010Understanding Morphology, 2nd edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Hartmann, Iren
2015Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1: Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 41–72. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1976Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina
2017A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Charlotte
2021When an antipassive isn’t an antipassive anymore: The Actor Voice construction in Kelabit. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2018The partitive A: On uses of the Finnish partitive subject in transitive clauses. In Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking, Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds), 423–453. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2012From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11): 1207–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013The Slavonic languages and the development of the antipassive marker. In Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 146], Irina Kor Chahine (ed.), 61–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aL’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Brussels: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bOn the reflexive-antipassive polysemy: Typological convergence from unrelated languages. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Nicholas Rolle, Jeremy Steffman & John Sylak-Glassman (eds), 158–173. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2021The coding of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana
1987Transitivity and Grammatical Relations in Inuktitut. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
1999The decline of ergativity in Labrador Inuttut. In Papers from the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Native American Languages, Leora Bar-El, Rose-Marie Déchaine & Charlotte Reinholtz (eds). MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 73–90.Google Scholar
2001Ergative to accusative comparing evidence from Inuktitut. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 205–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Ergativity and change in Inuktitut. In Ergativity: Emerging Issues, Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juvénal Ndayiragije (eds), 293–311. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juárez, Cristian & Álvarez González, Albert
2017The antipassive marking in Mocoví: Forms and functions. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez González & Ia Navarro (eds), 228–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Explaining the antipassive-causative syncretism in Mocoví (Guaycuruan). In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Polinskaja, Maria S.
1988Antipassive in Chukchee: Oblique object, object incorporation, zero object. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2011Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae J. Song (ed.), 368–398. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy
1946Ergativnost’ i stadial’nost’ v jazyke. Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR. Serija Literatury i Jazyka 5: 387–393.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1949La construction ergative et le développement stadial du langage. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 18: 84–92.Google Scholar
Lanz, Linda A.
2010A Grammar of Inupiaq Morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Larsson, Lars-Gunnar
1983Studien zum Partitivgebrauch in den ostseefinnischen Sprachen [AUU: Studia Uralica et Altaica Upsaliensia 15]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Launey, Michel
1980Introduction à la langue et à la littérature aztèques. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
2002Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica 36(3–4): 141–190.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
2009Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2015Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 73–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Markedness effects in applicative formation: Theoretical and typological perspectives. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez González & Ia Navarro (eds), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
2000The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
2006Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1994The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Antipassive propensities and alignment. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito
2015Valency classes in Central Alaskan Yupik, an Eskimoan language. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 2, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1165–1204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2021Antipassive constructions in Oceanic languages. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mroczyńska, Katarzyna
2018Realizations of Antipassive-Like Structures in Polish and English. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Tadataka
2006Agentive and Patientive Verb Bases in North Alaskan Inupiaq. PhD dissertation, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Nouguier Voisin, Sylvie
2002Relations entre fonctions syntaxiques et fonctions sémantiques en Wolof. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
2005Antipassif et langues accusatives. In Linguistique Typologique, Gilbert Lazard & Claire Moyse-Faurie (eds), 193–206. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1994Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patz, Elizabeth
2002A Grammar of the Kuku Yulanji Language of North Queensland. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L.
2021The profile and development of the Maa (Eastern Nilotic) antipassive. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1994The pragmatics of voice in a Philippine language: Actor-focus and goal-focus in Cebuano narrative. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 317–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2005Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 438–439. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017aAntipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa de Mena Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017bSyntactic ergativity. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn, Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustet, Regina & Rood, David S.
2008Argument dereferentialization in Lakota. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 334–356. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Queixalós, Francisco
2010Grammatical relations in Katukina-Kanamari. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francisco Queixalós (eds), 235–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renaudier, Marie
2012Dérivation et valence en sereer, variété de Mar Lodj (Atlantique, Sénégal). PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1988Ergative, passive, and antipassive in Nez Perce: A discourse perspective. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 547–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34: 175–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapién, Racquel-María, Cáceres Arandia, Natalia, Gildea, Spike & Meira, Sérgio
2021Antipassive in the Cariban family. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Say, Sergey
2005Antipassive sja-verbs in Russian: Between inflection and derivation. In Morphology and its Demarcations [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schikowski, Robert, Paudyal, Netra P. & Bickel, Balthasar
2015Flexible valency in Chintang. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1: Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 669–707. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A., Janic, Katarzyna, Ben Dror, Oneg & Dermaku-Appelganz, Darja
2021Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2006On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44: 217–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1972Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems, Part I. Language 48(2): 378–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies; Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2005Third person arguments in Inuktitut. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of the Languages of the Americas 10, Vol. 17, Solveiga Armoskaite & James J. Thompson (eds), 215–225. Vancouver BC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2010On the conditions for antipassives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7): 556–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
2006Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 501–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2006Jiarongyu dongci de paisheng xingtai (Derivational morphology in the Rgyalrong verb). Minzu Yuwen 4: 3–14.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2004Antipassiv kak aktionsal’nyj modificator: Dannye Godoberinskogo Jazyka. Presented at the International Symposium on Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations in Languages spoken in Europe, North and Central Asia, Kazan.
Tchekhoff, Claude
1987‘Antipassif’: Aspect imperfectif et autonomie du sujet. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 82: 43–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
2006Reflexive and middle constructions of Warrungu (Australia). In Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani [Typological Studies in Language 65], Tasaku Tsunoda & Tarō Kageyama (eds), 299–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar
2016“Simple” and “double” applicatives in Shiwilu (Kawapanan). Studies in Language 40(3): 513–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van ValinJr., Robert D.
1980On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. Lingua 50: 303–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Alejandra & Payne, Doris L.
2021Polyfunctional vanka- in Nivaĉle and the antipassive category. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigus, Meagan
2018Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology 22(3): 339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Honore
2015Valency classes in Sliammon Salish. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1: Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1293–1338. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2011Typological Variation in Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
2019Argument selectors. A new perspective on grammatical relations: An introduction. In Argument Selectors. A new Perspective on Grammatical Relations [Typological Studies in Language 123], Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel (eds), 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Seržant, Ilja A.
2018Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In The Diachronic Typology of Differential Argument Marking, Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds), 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony & Sadock, Jerrold
1986Affixial verbs in syntax: A reply to Grimshaw and Mester. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 229–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando, & Fernández, Beatriz
2021Antipassivization in Basque revisited. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo
2019Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker, Zaira Khalilova & Helma van den Berg
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 515 ff. Crossref logo
Janic, Katarzyna
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Payne, Doris L.
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
Sapién, Racquel-María, Natalia Cáceres Arandia, Spike Gildea & Sérgio Meira
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.