Chapter published in:
Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan
Edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen and Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
[Task-Based Language Teaching 13] 2019
► pp. 1538
References

References

Ahangari, S, & Abdi, M.
(2011) The effect of pre-task planning on the accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1950–1959. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadian, M.
(2011) The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16, 129–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 165–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadian, M., & Tavakoli, M.
(2010) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity and fluency of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aubrey, S. (2015) Effect of inter-cultural contact on L2 motivation and L2 learning: A process product study (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Bui, H.
(2014) Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.63–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bygate, M.
2001Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. & Perfetti, C. A.
(2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2005a (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2005bPlanning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.) (pp.3–34). Crossref
Ellis R.
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Li, S., & Zhu, Y.
(2018) The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster P., & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukuta, J.
(2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20, 321–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guará-Tavares, M. G.
(2008) Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.Google Scholar
Hawkes, M.
(2012) Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66(3), 327–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H.
(2012) Investigating the effects of planning on L2 chat performance. Calico Journal, 26, 619–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The effect of task planning on L2 performance in text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. Applied Linguistics, advance access August 7.Google Scholar
Kim, J.
(2012) Effects of pre-task modelling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 8–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.
2013Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.). Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp.3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D.
(2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1),167–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, L., Chen, J., & Sun, L.
(2015) The effects of different lengths of pre-task planning time on L2 learners’ oral test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 38–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., & Kunitz, S.
(2013) Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63, 629–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehnert U.
1998The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 52–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehrang, F., & Rahimpour, M.
(2010) The impact of task structure and planning conditions on oral performance of EFL learners. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3678–3686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L.
(2008) Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, K.
(2014) Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity? Language Teaching Research, 18, 272–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pang, F., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.). Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.95–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patansorn, C.
(2010) Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework'. Applied Linguistics , 22(1): 27–57.Google Scholar
Saeedi, M.
(2015) Unguided planning, task structure and L2 oral performance: Focusing on complexity, accuracy and fluency. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2, 263–274.Google Scholar
Sheppard, C., & Ellis, R.
(2018) The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the performance of on the same task and a new task of the same type. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.171–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
1996A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.). Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.). Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for language pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.). Planning and task-performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.
(2011) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on earner output. Language Learning, 61, 37–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P.
(2016) Focus on form through repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research, 20, 300–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.
(2014On time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.27–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2016) Phonological and executive working memory in task-based speech planning and performance. Language Learning Journal, 44, 418–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
2003The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bui, Gavin
2019. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Bui, Gavin & (Mark) Feng Teng
2019.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2020. The role of task repetition with direct written corrective feedback in L2 writing complexity, accuracy and fluency. Journal of Second Language Studies 3:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Kong, Amy & Gavin Bui
2019. Disambiguating recasts with prosodic and extra-linguistic cues in task-based interactions among young learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.