Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2020) ► pp. 275305


Baratta, A.
(2009) Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1406–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies 1.42–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J. and Zhang, M.
(2018) Using corpus-based analysis to study register and dialect variation on the searchable web. In E. Friginal (ed.), Studies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics, 83–111. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English. Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P.
(eds.) (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1996) Inferring identifiability and accessibility. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view (pp. 37–46). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, H., & Wanner, A.
(2010) Introduction. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 1–26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
(2016) Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 233–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1992) The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2013) More than discipline: uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015a) On the complexity of academic writing: Disciplinary variation and structural complexity. In V. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based research in applied linguistics. In honor of Douglas Biber (pp. 49–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, S.
(1996) Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Habibie, P., & Hyland, K.
(Eds.) (2019) Novice writers and scholarly publication. authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M.
(2015) World Englishes. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 381–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. & Mair, C.
(1999) ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4(2), 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M., Schneider, G., Seoane, E.
(2016) The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local vs global usage in an international language. Corpora, 11(1), 29–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Genre, discipline and identity. English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imo, W.
(2010)  Mein Problem ist/mein Thema ist (‘My problem is/my topic is’): How syntactic patterns and genres interact. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 141–166). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. International Corpus of English (www​.ice​-corpora​.uzh​.ch​/en​/design​.html). Crossref
Irvine, J.
(2001) ‘Style’as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B.
(1985) Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kruger, H. & van Rooy, B.
(2016) Constrained language: A multidimensional analysis of translated English and a non-native indigenised variety of English. English World-Wide, 77(1), 26–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Register variation in written contact varieties of English. A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide, 39(2), 214–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) A multifactorial analysis of contact-induced change in speech reporting in written White South African English (WSAfE). English Language and Linguistics. E-pub before print. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., M. Hundt, C. Mair & N. Smith
(2009) Change in contemporary English. A grammatical style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, B.
(2010) Genre effects in the replacement of reflexives by particles. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, S.
(2013) Contrastive register variation: A quantitative approach to the comparison of English and German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E.
(2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, E.
(2006) Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In C. Dalton-Puffer, D. Kastovsky, N. Ritt & H. Schendl (Eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000 (pp. 191–211). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2012) Givenness and word order: A study of long passives in Modern and Present-Day English. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. J. López-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 139–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) On the conventionalisation of the passive voice in Late Modern English scientific discourse. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 14(1), 70–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, E., & Hundt, M.
(2018) Styling academic Englishes: authorial presence across disciplines. Journal of English Linguistics, 46(1), 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setter, J., Wong, C. S. P., Chan, B. H. S.
(2010) Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, C.
(2014) Relative clauses in Asian Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(3), 245–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V.
(1998) On the use of the passive and active voice in astrophysics journal papers: With extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes, 17(1), 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tse, P. & K. Hyland
(2010) Claiming a territory: Relative clauses in journal descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1880–1889. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B., Terblanche, L., Haase, C. & Schmied, J.
(2010) Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide, 31(3), 311–349.Google Scholar
Wood, A.
(2001) International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R.
(2009) Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar