Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:2 (2021) ► pp. 173197
References

References

Primary sources

Cobbett’s Parliamentary History of England, Volume 1: From the Norman Conquest, in 1066, to the Year
1809 London: Curson Hansard.Google Scholar
Guanzi (Master Guan)
2016 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Guoyu (Discourses of the States)
2016 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Lüshi Chunqiu (Master Lü’s Spring and Autumn Annals)
2011 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Shiji (Records of the Grand Historian)
2011 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Yanzi Chunqiu (Annals of Master Yan)
2015 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Zhan Guo Ce (Annals of the Warring States)
2012 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Zuozhuan (The Commentary of Zuo)
2016 Edition. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Agha, Asif
1998 “Stereotypes and Registers of Honorific Language.” Language in Society 27 (2): 151–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel
1981 “Rules for Ritual Challenges: A Speech Convention among Medieval Knights.” Journal of Pragmatics 5 (5): 423–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2001 “Historical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 138–160. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2020 “Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The Strategic Use of Ritual References to The Speaker of The UK House of Commons.” Pragmatics 30 (1): 64–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Minglun 蔡明倫
2009 “Mingdai guanyuan jinjian moshi ji qi tedian 明代官員進諫模式及其特點 [The key features of admonishments in the Ming Dynasty].” Beijing Lianhe Daxue Xuebao 北京聯合大學學報 [Journal of Beijing United University] 7 (4): 62–68.Google Scholar
Chen, Kuang-Yu
2017 “ The Book of Odes: A Case Study of the Chinese Hermeneutic Tradition. In Interpretation and Intellectual Change: Chinese Hermeneutics in Historical Perspective, ed. by Ching-I Tu, 47–62. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Xinren
2019 “ ‘Family-culture’ and Chinese Politeness An Emancipatory Pragmatic Account.” Acta Linguistica Academica 66 (2): 251–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Wei 陳瑋
2011 “Richang hanyu guiquan yanyu xingwei ji celüeyanjiu 日常漢語規勸言語行為及策略研究 [On admonishing speech acts and strategies adopted in daily Chinese communication].” Jixi daxue xuebao 雞西大學學報 [Journal of Jixi University] 11 (2): 130–133.Google Scholar
Dauphinais, Michael, and Matthew Levering
2005Holy People, Holy Land: A Theological Introduction to the Bible. New York: Baker Books.Google Scholar
DuBois, James M.
2002 “Adolf Reinach: Metaethics and The Philosophy of Law.” Phenomenological Approaches to Moral Philosophy 47: 327–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis
1981Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis, and Juliane House
1981Let’s Talk and Talk About It: An Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Galvany, Albert
2012 “Sly Mouths and Silver Tongues: The Dynamics of Psychological Persuasion in Ancient China.” Extreme-Orient 34: 15–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2015 “Setting the Linguistics Research Agenda for the E-service Encounters Genre: Natively Digital versus Digitized Perspectives.” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by Maria de la O Hernández-López, and Lucía Fernández Amaya, 13–36. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Green, Eugene
1995 “On Syntactic and Pragmatic Features of Speech Acts in Wulfstan’s Homilies.” In Insights in Germanic Linguistics I: Methodology in Transition, ed. by Irmengard Rauch, and Gerald F. Carr, 109–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Han, Gaonian 韓高年
2018 “Chunqiu ‘Lizhi’ yu ‘Jingguo-zhi-wen’ de shengcheng – Yi zhenglun, jianci, wendui santi wei hexin 春秋“禮治”與“經國之文”的生成 – 以政論、諫辭、問對三體為核心 [‘Lizhi’ in the Spring and Autumn Period and the creation of ‘Jingguo Zhiwen’: Examining political commentary, admonishment rhetoric and question-answers].” Wen-Shi-Zhe 文史哲 [Literature, History and Philosophy] 364 (1): 70–88.Google Scholar
He, Taole 賀陶樂
2003 “ ‘Zuozhuan’ jianshuo yingdui-de celüe yishu 《左傳》諫說應對的策略藝術 [The art of persuasion tactics Zuozhuan].” Xibei nonglin-keji-daxue xuebao 西北農林科技大學學報 [Journal of Northeast A&F University] 3 (5): 134–137.Google Scholar
He, Ziran, and Wei Ren
2016 “Current Address Behaviour in China.” East Asian Pragmatics 1 (2): 163–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hostetler, Margaret
2012 “The Politeness of a Disciplining Text: Ideal Readers in Ancrene Wisse.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13 (1): 29–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
1986 “Acquiring Translational Competence in Interaction.” In Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies, ed. by Juliane House, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 179–192. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1989 “Politeness in English and German: The Functions of Please and Bitte .” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2021Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Walter
1993 “What Did the Prophets Think They Were Doing? Speech Acts and Prophetic Discourse in the Old Testament.” Biblical Interpretation 1 (2): 167–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker
1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in The History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2007Terms of (Im)Politeness: On the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese Terms of Address. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.Google Scholar
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House
2020 “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach.” Pragmatics 30 (1): 142–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu, and Wenrui Shi
2020 “Reporting Ritual Political Advice in the Chinese State Media: A study of the National People’s Congress.” Discourse, Context & Media 35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallia, Alexandra
2005 “Directness as a Source of Misunderstanding: The Case of Requests and Suggestions.” In Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, ed. by Robin Lakoff and Sachiko Ide, 217–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ke, Zhenchang 柯鎮昌
2012 “Xian-Qin jian-tiwen ji qi wenhua yiyun 先秦諫體文及其文化意蘊 [Admonishing literary pieces and their cultural impact in Pre-Qin China].” Wenyi pinglun 文藝評論 [Literature and Art Criticism] 10: 4–7.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2011 “From Good Manners to Facework: Politeness Variations and Constants in France, From the Classic Age to Today.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 133–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
1999 “Corpora and Speech Acts: The Study of Performatives.” In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, ed. by Christian Mair, and Marianne Hundt, 177–186. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, Miriam
1976Ancient Egyptian Literature: A Book of Readings. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mao, Zhixiang 冒誌祥, and Jiyong Hou 侯吉永
2007 “Gudai jinjian gongwen de shuofu xiuci 古代進諫公文的說服修辭 [On persuasive rhetoric in ancient admonishment sources]”. Xiuci xuexi 修辭學習 [Rhetoric Study] 144 (6): 76–78.Google Scholar
McCabe, David R.
2008How to Kill Things with Words: Ananias and Sapphira Under the Apostolic-Prophetic Speech-Act of Divine Judgment (Acts 4:32–5:11). PhD Thesis, Edinburgh, The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ning, Dengguo 寧登國
2012 “Xian-Qin tingzheng zhidu yu jianti wenxue de xingsheng 先秦聽證制度與諫體文學的興盛 [The hearing system of the Pre-Qin period and the development of the admonishment literature].” Xueshu luntan 學術論壇 [Academic Forum] 6 (1): 158–162.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Kádár, Dániel Z. Kádár
2011aPoliteness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2011b “Historical vs. Contemporary Chinese Linguistic Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1525–1539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, David L.
2002The Prophetic Literature: An Introduction. Westminster: John Know Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Xingchen, and Xinren Chen
2019 “Doing Power Threatening Acts (PTAs) in Ancient China: An Empirical Study of Chinese Jian Discourse.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20 (1): 132–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Christopher D.
2004Arguing with Scripture: The Rhetoric of Quotations in the Letters of Paul. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tasca, Luisa
2004Galatei. Buone maniere e cultura borghese nell’Italia dell’Ottocento [Etiquette. Good manners and bourgeois culture in nineteenth-century Italy] Florence: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Zeng, Qing Gong
2019 “Democracy Wisdom in Ancient China: Remonstrating with the Emperor.” Paper presented at the RSU International Research Conference 2019. Retrieved from: https://​rsucon​.rsu​.ac​.th​/files​/proceedings​/inter2019​/IN19​-202​.pdf
Zhu, Ling 朱玲
2005 “Gudai fengjian de yuyong celüe he xiuci renzhi 古代諷諫的語用策略和修辭認知 [The pragmatic strategies and rhetoric cognition of admonishment in ancient China].” Huadong shifan daxue xuebao 華東師範大學學報 [Journal of East China Normal University] (37) 6: 85–90.Google Scholar