Review published in:
NOWELE
Vol. 73:2 (2020) ► pp. 299309
References

References

Boas, H. C.
2009The life and death of Texas German. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cathey, J. E.
1997Variation and reduction in Modern Faroese vowels. In T. Brinkmann et al. (eds.), Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik. Festschrift für Otmar Werner, 91–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. W. & G. K. Iverson
1995Segment organization in the High German Consonant Shift. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 7. 111–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goblirsch, K.
1994Consonant strength in Upper German dialects. Odense: Odense University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002On the development of Germanic consonants: The Danish Shift and the Danish Lenition. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 124. 199–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Lautverschiebungen in den germanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2015Aspiration und Lautverschiebung: Zur Typologie des Niederländischen. North-Western European Language Evolution 68. 187–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haldiman, H.
1903Der Vokalismus der Mundart von Goldbach. Zeitschrift für hochdeutsche Mundarten 4. 295–351.Google Scholar
Hall, T. A.
2014The analysis of Westphalian German spirantization. Diachronica 31. 223–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The modern reflexes of Westphalian German Schärfung . Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 82. 26–47.Google Scholar
Holsinger, D. J.
2000Lenition in Germanic: Prosodic templates in sound change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
2008Germanic prosody and consonant strength. In J. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer & P. Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and fortition, 273–300. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, F.
1886Die Soester Mundart. Laut- und Formenlehre. Leipzig: Soltau.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & M. Fricke
2018Auditory disruption improves word segmentation: A functional basis for lenition phenomena. Glossa 3. 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranzmayer, E.
1981Laut- und Flexionslehre der deutschen Zimbrischen Mundart. Ed. by M. Hornung. Vienna: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1981Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57. 267–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A.
1992A bird’s-eye view of open syllable lengthening in English and the other Germanic languages. North-Western European Language Evolution 20. 67–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 309 ]
Mailhammer, R., W. W. Kruger & A. Makiyama
2015Type frequency influences phonological generalizations: Eliminating stressed open syllables with short vowels in West Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27. 205–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, M.
2000Constraints on syllable structure in Early Germanic. Journal of Indo- European Studies 28. 17–29.Google Scholar
Polomé, E.
1949A West Germanic reflex of the Verschärfung . Language 25. 182–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Restle, D.
2003Silbenschnitt – Quantität – Kopplung. Zur Geschichte, Charakterisierung und Repräsentation der Anschlußprosodie. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
Riad, T.
1995The quantity shift in Germanic: A typology. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 42. 159–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, V. M.
1962Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Söderström, S.
1972Om kvantitetsutvecklingen i norrländskamål. Gammal kort stavelse i Kalix- och Pitemålen i Nordmalungs och Raglenda socknar. Uppsala: Almqvist.Google Scholar
Spiekermann, H.
2000Silbenschnitt in deutschen Dialekten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., W. Labov & M. Herzog
1968Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–198. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar