Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 15:3 (2020) ► pp. 422463
References

References

Androutsopoulos, J.
(2011) Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2014) Multivariate statistics. In R. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 337–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L.
(1995) The CELEX Lexical Database(Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y.
(1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 461 ]
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J.
(1997) Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 268–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T.
(2005) Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
(1993) Woman, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
De Decker, B. & Vandekerckhove, R.
(2017) Global features of online communication in local Flemish: social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica, 51, 253–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisikovits, E.
(2006) Girl-talk/Boy-talk: Sex differences in adolescent speech. In: J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender. A reader (pp. 42–54). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Mak, W. M.
(2005) Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1160–1173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
(1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Monette, G.
(1992) Generalized collinearity diagnostics. JASA, 87, 178–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Sandra, D.
(2002) Homophonic Forms of Regularly Inflected Verbs Have Their Own Orthographic Representations: A Developmental Perspective on Spelling Errors. Brain and Language, 81, 545–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R., & Tibshirani, R. J.
(2017) Extended Comparisons of Best Subset Selection, Forward Stepwise Selection, and the Lasso.Google Scholar
Hilte, L.
(2019) The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, V.
(2010) What is it I am writing?! Lexical frequency effects in spelling Russian prefixes: Uncertainty and competition in an apparently regular system. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 157–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. Y.
(2017) Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 42(2), 152–155. Retrieved from: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(2001) Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Largy, P., Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P.
(1996) The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 217–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H.
(1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L.
(1989) Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003–1019.Google Scholar
[ p. 462 ]
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A.
(2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. P., & Woodall, W. H.
(2005) The most-cited statistical papers. Journal of Applied Statistics, 32, 461–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D.
(2010) Homophone Dominance at the Whole-word and Sub-word Levels: Spelling Errors Suggest Full-form Storage of Regularly Inflected Verb Forms. Language and Speech, 53(3), 405–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D. & Van Abbenyen, L.
(2009) Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 239–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F.
(1999) Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language, 68, 277–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, T., Chamalaun, R., & Ernestus, M.
(2018) The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media. A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 111–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Surkyn, H., Vandekerckhove, R., & Sandra, D.
(2019) Errors Outside the Lab: The Interaction of a Psycholinguistic and a Sociolinguistic Variable in the Production of Verb Spelling Errors in Informal Computer-Mediated Communication. In J. Longhi & C. Marinica (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (CMC-Corpora2019) (pp. 59–62). Paris.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2011) Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bergh, H. & van Es, A., & Spijker, S.
(2011) Spelling op verschillende niveaus: werkwoordspelling aan het einde van de basisschool en het einde van het voorgezet onderwijs. [Spelling at different levels: verb spelling at the end of primary school and at the end of secondary education]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 12(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Van der Horst, M., van den Bergh, H., & Evers-Vermeul, J.
(2012) Kunnen leerlingen wat ze moeten kunnen? Onderzoek naar de doorlopende leerlijn op het gebied van werkwoordspelling. [Can students do what they need to be able to do? Research into the continuous learning line in the field of verb spelling]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 2, 33–42.Google Scholar
Van der Velde, I.
(1956) De tragedie der werkwoordsvormen. Een taalhistorische en taaldidactische studie. [The tragedy of verb forms. A language historical and language didactic study]. Groningen: Noordhoff Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R. & Sandra, D.
(2016) De potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpraktijk van Vlaamse tieners in schoolcontext. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(3), 201–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhaert, N.
(2016) Rules or regularities? The Homophone Dominance effect in spelling and reading regular Dutch verb forms. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).Google Scholar
[ p. 463 ]
Verhaert, N., & Sandra, D.
(2016) Homofoondominantie veroorzaakt dt-fouten tijdens het spellen en maakt er ons blind voor tijdens het lezen. [Homophone dominance causes dt-errors during spelling and makes us blind to them while reading]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 17(4), 37–46.Google Scholar
Verhaert, N., Danckaert, E., & Sandra, D.
(2016) The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon, 11(1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vignette on emmeans Package R (Basics of estimated marginal means)
VVKSO
(2006) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs bso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education bso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: http://​ond​.vvkso​-ict​.com​/leerplannen​/doc​/Nederlands​-2006​-020​.pdf
(2014) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs aso-kso-tso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education aso-kso-tso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: http://​ond​.vvkso​-ict​.com​/leerplannen​/doc​/Nederlands​-2014​-001​.pdf