Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 15:3 (2020) ► pp. 508531
References

References

3017 Treatment
(2014) Retrieved from http://​www​.urbandictionary​.com on 01/28/2017.
Algeo, J.
(Ed.) (1991) Fifty years among the new words: A dictionary of neologisms, 1941–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, E. G., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Motter, A. E.
(2011) Niche as a determinant of word fate in online groups. PLoS ONE, 6(5), 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Badger & Blade online forum
(2017) Retrieved from https://​www​.badgerandblade​.com​/forum on 07/21/2017.
Chaffin, R., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E.
(2001) Learning new word meaning from context: A case study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(1), 225–235.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K.
(1992) Dialect acquisition. Language, 68(4), 673–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(2003) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 530 ]
de Vaan, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(2007) Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 2(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R.
(1998) Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2015) How words and vocabularies change. In J. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp. 416–430). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M.
(2000) The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Hohenhaus, P.
(2006)  Bouncebackability: A Web-as-corpus-based study of a new formation, its interpretation, generalization/spread and subsequent decline. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3, 17–27.Google Scholar
Kerremans, D.
(2015) A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. New York: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
(2000) Potential words. Word, 51(2), 205–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kouzis-Loukas, D.
(2016) Learning Scrapy. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd. https://​scrapy​.org/
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A.
(2003) Understanding trendy neologisms. Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2), 369–382.Google Scholar
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D.
(2014) The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 55–60). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, A.
(2002) Predicting new words: The secrets of their success. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Neuman, Y., Nave, O., & Dolev, E.
(2010) Buzzwords on their way to a tipping-point: A view from the blogosphere. Complexity, 16(4), 58–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
(2017) Retrieved from http://​www​.oed​.com on 01/27/2017.
Paradowski, M. B., & Jonak, L.
(2012) Diffusion of linguistic innovation as social coordination. Psychology of Language and Communication, 16(2), 131–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Python Core Team
(2017) Python: A dynamic, open source progamming language. Python Software Foundation. https://​www​.python​.org/
Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. L.
(2010) Words as alleles: Connecting language evolution with Bayesian learners to models of genetic drift. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 429–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L.
(2017) The BeautifulSoup library for Python. http://​www​.crummy​.com​/software​/BeautifulSoup/
[ p. 531 ]