Article published in:
Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 11:2 (2020) ► pp. 163195
References

[ p. 190 ]References

Abbot-Smith, K., & Behrens, H.
(2006) How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 995–1026. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., Ferguson, H., Pine, J.
(2017) Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences?: A permutation analysis. PLoS ONE, 12(10): e0186129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adani, F., & Fritzsche, T.
(2015) On the relation between implicit and explicit measures of child language development: Evidence from relative clause processing in 4-year-olds and adults. In E. Grillo & K. Jepson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1, pp. 14–26). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Aschermann, E., Gülzow, I., & Wendt, D.
(2004) Differences in the comprehension of passive voice in German- and English-speaking children. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 235–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(1989) Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, T.
(2006) Erwerb und Verarbeitung komplexer grammatischer Strukturen bei Grundschulkindern. In T. Becker & C. Peschel (Eds.), Diskussionsforum Deutsch: Bd. 20. Gesteuerter und ungesteuerter Grammatikerwerb (pp. 156–173). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G.
(1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brinker, K.
(1971) Das Passiv im heutigen Deutsch. Form und Funktion. Heutiges Deutsch Reihe 1: Vol. 2. München/Düsseldorf: Hueber/Schwann.Google Scholar
Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C.
(2010) Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F.
(2001) Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., & Ferreira, F.
(2010) Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 538–544.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J.
(2006) Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28(6), 604–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 191 ]
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A.
(2006) Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2008) Young German children’s early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11(4), 575–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Familiar verbs are not always easier than novel verbs: How German pre-school children comprehend active and passive sentences. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 128–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
(1995) Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In P. A. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 105–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, P.
(2013) Der Satz (4., aktualisierte und überarb. Aufl.). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Bd. 2. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F.
(2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V.
(2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D.
(2007) The good enough approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R.
(2004) The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 661–681. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fritzenschaft, A.
(1994) Activating passives in child grammar. In R. Tracy & E. Lattey (Eds.), Linguistische Arbeiten: Vol. 309. How tolerant is universal grammar?: Essays on language learnability and language variation (pp. 155–184). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1995) Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gogolin, I., & Lange, I.
(2011) Bildungssprache und Durchgängige Sprachbildung. In S. Fürstenau & M. Gomolla (Eds.), Migration und schulischer Wandel: Mehrsprachigkeit (pp. 107–127). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N., Alexiadou, A., Gehrke, B., Hirsch, N., Paolazzi, C., & Santi, A.
(2019) Processing unambiguous verbal passives in German. Journal of Linguistics, 55, 523–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, H.
(1975) Verstehen, Imitation und Produktion von Passivsätzen. In H. Grimm, Scholer, H., & M. Wintermantel (Eds.), Zur Entwicklung sprachlicher Strukturformen bei Kindern (pp. 73–99). Heinheim: J Beltz Verlag.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T.
(2015) When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the lifespan. Psychological Science, 26(4), 433–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
Huang, Y., Gerard, J., Hsu, N., Kowalski, A., & Novick, J.
(2016) Cognitive-control effects on the kindergarten path: Separating correlation from causation. Poster presented at the 29th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. March 3–5, 2016, Gainesville, FL.
Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J.
(2013) Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the on-line processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 589–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Järvikivi, J., Pyykkönen-Klauck, P., Schimke, S., Colonna, S., & Hemforth, B.
(2013) Information structure cues for 4-year-olds and adults: Tracking eye movements to visually presented anaphoric referents. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(7), 877–892. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M.
(2003) Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 37–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F.
(2016) Good-enough linguistic representations and on-line cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 1013–1040. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, K., Bredel, U., & Reich, H. H.
(2008) Morphologisch-syntaktische Basisqualifikation. In K. Ehlich, U. Bredel, & H. H. Reich (Eds), Referenzrahmen zur altersspezifischen Sprachaneignung – Forschungsgrundlagen (pp. 63–82). Bonn/Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Stewart, A. J., & Serratrice, L.
(2011) Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 222–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
(1997) The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J.
(2005) The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95(1), 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P.
(1974) Children who get worse at understanding the passive: a replication of Bever. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3 ), 65–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T.
(2007) On-line processing of passives in L1 and L2 children. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp. 265–276). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Saddy, D.
(2013) Parsing the Passive: Comparing children with specific language impairment to sequential bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R.
(1993) Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 193 ]
Mills, A. E.
(1977) Parallel studies in first and second language acquisition. Ludwigsburg: R. O. U. Strauch Ludwigsburg.Google Scholar
(1985) The acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 141–254). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F.
(2013) Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 186–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C.
(2012) The effect of local discourse coherence on pronoun resolution: an eye-tracking study. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics On-line, 13, 98–119. Colchester: Department of Language and Linguistics, 96. URL: https://​www1​.essex​.ac​.uk​/langling​/documents​/research​/egspll​_vol13​.pdf#page​=98
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rayner, K.
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickheit, G.
(1975) Zur Entwicklung der Syntax im Grundschulalter. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Schouwenaars, A., Hendriks, P., & Ruigendijk, E.
(2018) German children’s processing of morphosyntactic cues in wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(06), 1279–1318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G.
(1982) Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, K., Eisenband, J., Norland, E., & Ratzan, J.
(2002) Tracking the acquisition and processing of English passives: Using acoustic cues to disam-biguate actives and passives. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing . New York, NY.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C.
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G.
(2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, Ma. u.a.: Bradford Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L.
(1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, E. A., & Rommetveit, R.
(1967a) The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility, Child Development, 38 , 649–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weighall, A. R.
(2007) The kindergarten-path effect revisited : Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(2), 75–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2005) German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues act locally. First Language, 25(1), 103–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar