Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2021) ► pp. 302337

[ p. 332 ]References

Abney, Steven Paul
1987The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Ahn, Dorothy
2017Definite and demonstrative descriptions: A micro-typology. In Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka (ed.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 84), vol. 1, 33–48. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
1998Partitives, double genitives and anti-uniqueness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(4). 679–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Cooper, Robin
1981Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(2). 159–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On d-trees, beans, and b-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5). 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Soo Jung
2009Nominal structure and interpretation: On the syntax of the Korean determiner phrase. Athens-Clarke: University of Georgia. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
2009On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 24), 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Hye-Sun
1999Interpretation and function of the Korean demonstrative ku . Studies in Modern Grammar 18. 71–90.Google Scholar
Cho, Jacee
2017The acquisition of different types of definite noun phrases in L2-English. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(3). 367–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jinyoung
2007Free choice and negative polarity: A compositional analysis of Korean polarity sensitive items. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Christophersen, Paul
1939The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A.
2003Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, Paul
2005Situations and individuals. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008Demonstratives as individual concepts. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(4). 409–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi
2005Quantification and domain restriction in Basque. Leioa: University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi & Giannakidou, Anastasia
2010Contextual domain restriction and the definite determiner. In Recanati, François & Stojanovic, Isidora & Villanueva, Neftalı (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective and relativity (Mouton Series in Pragmatics 6), 93–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014D-heads, domain restriction and variation: From Greek and Basque to Salish. In Etxeberria, Urtzi & Giannakidou, Anastasia & Schürcks Lilia (eds.), The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond (Studies in Generative Grammar 116), 413–440. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. & Giannakidou, Anastasia
2019Definiteness, partitivity and domain restriction: A fresh look at definite reduplication. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Pozas Loyo, Julia & Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado, Violeta (eds.), Definiteness across languages (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 25), 419–452. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 333 ]
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2004Domain restriction and the arguments of quantificational determiners. In Young, Robert B. (ed.), SALT 14: Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 110–126. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
2006(In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23(2). 135–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, Carrie
2006The semantics of determiners: Domain restriction in Skwxwú7mesh. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2009The semantic core of determiners: Evidence from Skwxwú7mesh. In Ghomeshi, Jila & Ileana, Paul & Wiltschko, Martina (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation (Linguistics Today 147), 177–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1988Universals of topic-comment structure. In Hammond, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith A. & Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1980Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(3). 419–427.Google Scholar
1991On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27(2). 405–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
1990E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2). 137–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania
2006 This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14(2). 175–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Baek, Soondo & Kim, Eunah & Ko, Heejeong & Ken, Wexler
2011 That’s the meaning: Interpretation of definite and demonstrative descriptions in L2-English. In Pirvulescu, Mihaela & Cuervo, María Cristina & Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa & Steele, Jeffrey & Strik, Nelleke (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2010), 122–138. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Baek, Soondo & Kim, Eunah & Ko, Heejeong & Kenneth Wexler
2012 That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 28(1). 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Peter
2018Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49(3). 501–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit
1987On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
1990Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(3). 273–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, Makoto
2012Japanese demonstrative so-no as a modifier lacking definiteness. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Chernilovskaya, Anna & Nouwen, Rick (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, vol. 2, 335–348. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2014The semantics and syntax of Japanese adnominal demonstratives. In Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference (Syntax and Semantics 39), 239–268. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
[ p. 334 ]
Kang, Arum
2012Semantics and pragmatics of definiteness in Korean: The case of ku . In Umut Ozge (ed.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 67: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 8), 187–198. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2015(In)definiteness, disjunction and anti-specificity in Korean: A study in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Chicago: University of Chicago. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2018Unexpectedness effect: The emphatic determiner with gradable NPs in Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 33(4). 595–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo
1994Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3(1). 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ilkyu
2015Is Korean -(n)un a topic marker? On the nature of -(n)un and its relation to information structure. Lingua 154. 87–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo
2016Cognitive indexical usage of demonstrative ku in Korean and a split DP analysis. In Kim, Tae Sik & Ha, Seungwan (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (SICOGG 18), Beyond core syntax: A minimalist approach, 175–194. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.Google Scholar
2019The syntax and semantics of noun modifiers and the theory of universal grammar: A Korean perspective (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 96). Switzerland: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo & Kaufmann, Stefan
2007Domain restriction in freedom of choice: A view from Korean Indet-na items. In McNally, Louise & Puig-Waldmüller, Estela (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 375–389. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
King, Jeffrey C.
2001Complex demonstratives: A quantificational account. Cambridge: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chungmin
1989(In)Definites, case markers, classifiers and quantifiers in Korean. In Kuno, Susumu & Kim, Young-joo & Whitman, John & Kang, Young-Se & Lee, Ik-Hwan & Bak, Sung-Yun (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III: Proceedings of the 1989 Workshop on Korean Linguistics (Harvard WOKL-1989), 469–488. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
1994Definite/specific and case marking in Korean. In Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (ed.), Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics, 325–341. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
1995A unified account of polarity phenomena. In T’sou, Benjamin K. & Lai, Tom B. Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 10), 281–291. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin & Chung, Daeho & Nam, Seungho
2000The semantics of amwu-N-to​/-irato/-ina in Korean: Arbitrary choice and concession. In Ikeya, Akira & Kawamori, Masahito (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 14), 413–423. Chiba: PACLIC 14 Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983Logical semantics for natural language. In Hempel, Carl G. & Putnam, Hilary & Essler, Wilhelm K. (eds.), Methodology, epistemology, and philosophy of science: Essays in honour of Wolfgang Stegmüller on the occasion of his 60th birthday, June 3rd, 1983, 261–283. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4). 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Google Scholar
[ p. 335 ]
Lyons, Christopher
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martí Martínez, María Luisa
2003Contextual variables. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa
1996Determiner systems and quantificational strategies: Evidence from Salish. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.).Google Scholar
2001Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9(2). 145–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Ethan
2019Complex demonstratives, hidden arguments, and presupposition. Synthese (2019) (https://​link​.springer​.com​/article​/10​.1007​/s11229​-019​-02250​-5) (Accessed 2020-10-22.) Crossref
Oshima, David Y. & McCready, Eric
2017Anaphoric demonstratives and mutual knowledge: The cases of Japanese and English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(3). 801–837. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Eun-Hae
2009(Wh-)indeterminates, free choice, and expressive content in Korean. Chicago: University of Chicago. (Doctoral Dissertation.)Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In Yoon, Jae-Hak & Kathol, Andreas (eds.), Papers in semantics (OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49), 91–136. Columbus: Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
2002Demonstratives as definites. In van Deemter, Kees & Kibble, Rodger (eds.), Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation (CSLI Lecture Notes Series 143), 89–136. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2003Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(3). 287–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1905On denoting. Mind 14(4). 479–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2009Two types of definites in natural language. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2013Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(10). 534–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
2001The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published in 1999.)Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Korean. 1st edn. London: Routledge. (First published in 1994.)
Stalnaker, Robert C.
1978Assertion. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Syntax and semantics, volume 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason
2002Nominal restriction. In Preyer, Gerhard & Peter, Georg (eds.), Logical form and language, 365–388. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltán Gendler
2000On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3). 219–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950On referring. Mind 59(235). 320–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 336 ]
Suh, Eugenia
2005The nominal phrase in Korean: The role of D in a “determiner-less” language. In Heffernan, Kevin & Suh, Eugenia (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25: Niagara Linguistics Society 2005 Conference Proceedings, 10–19. Toronto: Linguistics Graduate Course Union, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
1987Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Kenesei, István (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, volume 2: Theories and analyses, 167–191. Szeged: JATE, University of Szeged.Google Scholar
Von Fintel, Kai
1994Restrictions on quantifier domains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
1998The semantics and pragmatics of quantifier domains. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.) (Notes for Vilem Mathesius Lectures at the Vilem Mathesius Center in Prague.)Google Scholar
Westerståhl, Dag
1984Determiners and context sets. In van Benthem, Johan & ter Meulen, Alice (eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 4), 45–71. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Wolter, Lynsey Kay
2006That’s that: The semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar