Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2021) ► pp. 213242
References

References

Ahn, Mikyung & Yap, Foong Ha
2017From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica 34(4). 437–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Huyim
1986‘-Ci’wa phitong [-Ci and passive]. Seoul: Thap Press.Google Scholar
1988Kwuke phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean passive]. Seoul: Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University.Google Scholar
Bak, Jae-Yeon
2007On the modal meanings of auxiliary construction -eoji-. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 50. 269–293.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea S.
2005Reflexive-middle and reciprocal-middle continua in Romanian. In Mushin, Ilana (ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–13. Sydney: University of Sydney. (http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2123​/106) (Accessed 2020-05-​15.)
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
1999The English get-passive in spoken discourse: Description and implications for an interpersonal grammar. English Language and Linguistics 3(1). 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
1980Is the get-passive adversative? Papers in Linguistics 13(3). 411–452. ( Papers in Linguistics is known as Research on Language and Social Interaction since 1987.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Hyunbae
1961[1937]Wuli malpon [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Cengum Publishing.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo
1989The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. In Branigan, P. & Gaulding, J. & Kubo, M. & Murasugi, K. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: Proceedings of the 1st Student Conference in Linguistics, 16–30. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M.
1977Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas
2006The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 240 ]
Haspelmath, Martin
1987Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type (Arbeitspapier, N.F., Nr. 5). Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume I: Theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Eon-hak
2002Study on the grammaticalization of the ‘-go isda’ construction. The Chin-Tan Hakpo [The Chin-Tan Society] 94. 167–203.Google Scholar
2006Sangilonkwa pocoyongenuy yeksacek yenkwu [Historical studies on aspect and auxiliary verbs]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1985Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume I: Clause structure, 243–281. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Roeper, Thomas
1984On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 381–416.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha Kyun
1980 Kwukeuy sayekkwa swutonguy uymi [The meaning of causatives and passives in Korean]. Hangeul 168. 3–47.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1982Affectiveness and the voice system of Japanese: Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back. In Macaulay, Monica & Gensler, Orin D. & Brugman, Claudia & Civkulis, Inese & Dahlstrom, Amy & Krile, Katherine & Sturm, Rob (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 398–413. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1988Affectedness and control: A typology of voice systems. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and voice (Typological Studies in Language 16), 25–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Yŏng-jin
1997Hankwukeuymwunpephwakwaceng: Phwulissiuykyengwu [Grammaticalization of Korean: In the case of predicates]. Seoul: Kookhak publishing.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009Spatial reciprocity: Between grammar and lexis. In Helmbrecht, Johannes & Nishina, Yoko & Shin, Yong-Min & Skopeteas, Stavros & Verhoeven, Elisabeth (eds.), Form and function in language research: Papers in honour of Christian Lehmann (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 210), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Tag
2001 “Ci (ti)”- uy thongsicek pyencheney kwanhan yenkwu [On the historical development of -ti-]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 38. 117–136.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Su-kyong
2011 ‘-Ecita’ uymi kochaley tayhan silon emwun yenkwu [An essay on the meanings of ‘-eojida’: A typological perspective]. Emwun yenkwu [The Society for Korean Language and Literary Research] 39(3). 175–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 2011The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. ‎Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 241 ]
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions (Typological Studies in Language 12), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William D.
1980The derived intransitive construction in English. Lingua 52(1–2). 57–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Naoyuki
2013Event structure and the Japanese indirect passive. In Pustejovsky, James & Bouillon, Pierrette & Isahara, Hitoshi & Kanzaki, Kyoko & Lee, Chungmin (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (Text, Speech and Language Technology 46), 311–326. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, David Y.
2003Out of control: A unified analysis of Japanese passive constructions. In Kim, Jong-Bok & Wechsler, Stephen (eds.), The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 245–265. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006Adversity and Korean/Japanese passives: Constructional analogy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2). 137–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Seong Jong
1984(A) study on Korean passive. Seoul: Seoul National University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Prasithrathsint, Amara
2006Development of thùuk passive marker in Thai. In Abraham, Werner & Leisiö, Larisa (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function (Typological Studies in Language 68), 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seng, Kwangswu
1976 Kwuke kancepphitongey tayhaye [About indirect passive in Korean]. Mwunpepyenkwu [Studies on grammar] 3. 159–182.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives, and adversative passives. In Gahl, Susanne & Dolbey, Andy & Johnson, Christopher (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session, dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 461–486. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3, 57–149. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 1991Introduction. Approaches to grammaticalization, volume II: Types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:2), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valfells, Sigridur
1970Middle voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics 1, 551–572. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar
Winskel, Heather & Padakannaya, Prakash
(eds.) 2014South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 242 ]
Woo, Inhyey
1997Wulimal phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean Passives]. Seoul: Hankook Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jae-Hoon
1994Grammatical relation changing constructions in Korean: A functional-typological study. London: University of London. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar