Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 5:3 (2015) ► pp. 356378
References

References

Baayen, R.H., Schreuder, R., de Jong, N.H., & Krott, A.
(2002) Dutch inflection: The rules that prove the exception. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 61–92). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banga, A., Hanssen, E., Schreuder, R., & Neijt, A.
(2012) How subtle differences in orthography influence conceptual interpretation. Written Language and Literacy, 15(2), 185–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banga, A., Hanssen, E., Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R.
(2013) Preference for linking element -en in Dutch noun-noun compounds: Native speakers and second language learners of Dutch. Morphology, 23, 33–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
(2003) Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UniversityPress.Google Scholar
Berent, I., & Pinker, S.
(2007) The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2(2), 129–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.E.
(1992) Compounding in Dutch. Rivista di Linguistica, 4, 37–59.[ p. 373 ]Google Scholar
(1993) Against split morphology. In G.E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp. 27–49). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) The grammar of words. An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.E., & van Santen, A.
(1998) Morfologie: De woordstructuur van het Nederlands[Morphology: The word structure of Dutch]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bot, K. de
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied linguistics, 13(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) A bilingual’s production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. In L. Wei (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 420–442). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breuker, P.
(1993) Noarmaspekten fan it hjoeddeiske Frysk [Aspects of the standardization of present-day Frisian]. Groningen: Stifting FFYRUG.Google Scholar
Brisard, F., Laarman, E., & Nicoladis, E.
(2008) Clausal order and the acquisition of Dutch deverbal compounds. Morphology, 18, 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A.
(2004) Speech production in bilinguals. In T.K. Bhatia & W.C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 201–223). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
(2005) Lexical access in bilingual production. In J.F. Kroll & A.B.M. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 308–325). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Caramazza, A.
(1999) Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3),231–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
(2004).Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language,50, 491–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H.
(2008) The time-course of morphological constraints: A study of plurals inside derived words. The Mental Lexicon, 3(2), 149–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Fryske Taalatlas: Friese taal in beeld
(2011) [The Frisian linguistic atlas: Frisian language in pictures 2011]. A publication from the province Fryslân. Retrieved from www​.fryslan​.nl​/sjablonen​/1​/infotype​/webpage​/view​.asp​?objectID​=34785Google Scholar
Goeman, T.
(2001) Morfologische condities op n-behoud en n-deletie in dialecten van Nederland [Morphological conditions on n-preservation and n-deletion of dialects in the Netherlands]. Taal en Tongval themanummer 14: De variabiliteit van de -(ə)n in het Nederlands, 52–88.Google Scholar
Goossens, J.
(1987) Schets van de meervoudsvorming der substantieven in de Nederlandse dialecten [Sketch of the formation of the plural of nouns in the Dutch dialects]. Taal en Tongval, 39, 141–173.Google Scholar
Green, D.W.
(1986) Control, activation and resource. Brain and Language, 27(2), 210–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haan, G.J. de, Bloemhoff, H., & Versloot, A.P.
(2013) Language varieties in the province of Fryslân. In F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Language and space / Dutch: An international handbook on linguistic variation (pp. 721–738). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.[ p. 374 ]Google Scholar
Haas, W. de, & Trommelen, M.
(1993) Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming [Morphological Handbook of Dutch. An overview of word formation]. ’s-Gravenhage: SDU Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Hanssen, E., Banga, A., Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R.
(2012) The similarity of plural endings and linking elements in regional speech variants of Dutch. Language and Speech, 55(3), 437–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, E., Banga, A., Schreuder, R., & Neijt, A.
(2013) Semantic and prosodic effects of Dutch linking elements. Morphology, 23, 7–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Regular noun plurals as modifiers in spoken Dutch compounds. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Haskell, T.R., MacDonald, M.C., & Seidenberg, M.S.
(2003) Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research . Cognitive Psychology, 47, 119–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R.
(1998) Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 213–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, E.
(1996) Iets over eerste leden van samenstellingen [Something about first members of compounds]. Leuvense bijdragen, 84, 491–504.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, E., & Slofstra, B.
(2008) How majority languages influence minority languages. In T. de Graaf, N. Ostler, & R. Salverda (Eds.), Endangered languages and language learning. Proceedings of FEL XII 24-27 September 2008 (pp. 31–37). Fryske Akademy; Afûk, Ljouwert/Leeuwarden. Retrieved from http://​depot​.knaw​.nl​/5265/
Hoekstra, J.
(1998) Fryske Wurdfoarming [Frisian word formation]. Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(1982) Lexical morphology and phonology. In I.S. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 3–91). Seoul: Hansin.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(2002) Thoughts on grammaticalization. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität. Retrieved from http://​www​.db​-thueringen​.de​/servlets​/DerivateServlet​/Derivate​-2058​/ASSidUE09​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R.
(2005) English word-formation processes: Observations, issues, and thoughts on future research. In P. Stekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 375–427). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, A., Krebbers, L., & Fikkert, P.
(2002) Rhythm and semantics in the selection of linking elements. In H. Broekhuis & P. Fikkert (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002 (pp. 117–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H.
(2004) Seven years later. The effect of spelling on interpretation. In L. Cornips & J. Doetjes (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004 (pp. 134–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Popkema, J.
(2006) Grammatica fries. Utrecht/Ljouwert: Het Spectrum/Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T.
(1994) First language use and in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Pickering, M.J.
(2007) The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171. Crossref[ p. 375 ]Google Scholar
Schreuder, R., Neijt, A., van der Weide, F., & Baayen, R.H.
(1998) Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes or morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 551–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schutter, G. de
(2001) Nasaal of sjwa of allebei. De realisaties van het nasale meervoudssuffix bij substantieven in de Nederlandse dialecten. Taal en Tongval themanummer 14: De variabiliteit van de -(ə)n in het Nederlands, 113–141.Google Scholar
Schutter, G. de, van den Berg, B., Goeman, T., & de Jong, T.
(2005) Morfologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten, deel 1 [Morphological atlas of the Dutch dialects, part 1]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., MacDonald, M.C., & Haskell, T.R.
(2007) Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon, 2(3), 287–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sjölin, B.
(1976) “Min Frysk”: Een onderzoek naar het ontstaan van transfer en “code-switching” in gesproken Fries [“Bad Frisian”. An investigation into the causes of transfer and “code-switching in spoken Frisian]. Grins: Frysk Ynstitut oan de Ryksuniversiteit to Grins.Google Scholar
Slofstra, B., Hoekstra, E., & Versloot, A.P.
(2009) Een voorbeeld van gecamoufleerde taalbeïnvloeding: Samenstellingsvormen van sjwasubstantieven in het Fries [An example of camouflaged language influence: Compound forms of schwa nouns in Frisian]. Taal en Tongval, 61, 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velde, H. van de, & van Hout, R.
(2003) De deletie van de slot-n [The deletion of the final-n]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 8, 93–114.Google Scholar
Weijnen, A.
(1966) Nederlandse dialectkunde [Dutch dialectology]. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Wulf, C. de, Goossens, J., & Taeldeman, J.
(2005) Fonologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten. Deel IV. De consonanten [Phonological atlas of the Dutch dialects. Part IV. The consonants]. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor de Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar
Wulf, C. de, & Taeldeman, J.
(2001) Apocope en insertie van -n na sjwa in de zuidelijke Nederlandse dialecten: Conditionering en geografie [Apocope and insertion of -n after schwa in the Southern dialects of the Netherlands: Conditioning and geography]. Taal en Tongval themanummer 14: De variabiliteit van de -(ə)n in het Nederlands, 7–51.Google Scholar