Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 9:3 (2019) ► pp. 341375
References

References

Bar-Shalom, E. G., & Zaretsky, E.
(2008) Selective attrition in Russian-English bilingual children: Preservation of grammatical aspect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(4), 281–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, J.
(1996) Directionality and Logical Form. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M.
(2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. & Weinberg, A.
(1984) Grammars and models of language use: The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bousquette, J., Frey, B., Nützel, D., Putnam, M., & Salmons, J.
(2016) Parasitic gapping in bilingual grammar: evidence from Wisconsin Heritage German. Heritage Language Journal, 13(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M., & Chater, N.
(2016) Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G., McCloskey, J., Maling, J., & Zaenen, A.
(1983) String-vacuous rule application. Linguistic Inquiry, 14(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Cox, C.
(2013) The resilient word: Linguistic preservation and innovation among Old Colony Mennonites in Latin America. Journal of Mennonites Studies, 31(1), 51–74.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, J.
(2010) Complex wh-phrases don’t move: One the interaction between the Split CP Hypothesis and the syntax of wh-movement. In E. Phoevos Panagiotidis (Ed.), The complementizer phrase: Subjects and operators (236–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P.
(2013) Grammar and complexity: Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N.
(2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(01), 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P.
(2008) Language attrition and theories of forgetting: A cross-disciplinary view. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(3), 321–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, E.
(2001) Parasitic gaps. In P. Culicover & P. Postal (Eds.), Parasitic gaps (69–98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Reprinted from Linguistic Philosophy, 6, 5–34 1983).Google Scholar
Erdem, U.
(2015) Fragen mit langer w-Extraktion in der englischen Sprache – Ein Vergleich zwischen deutschen und türkischen Muttersprachlern. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G., & Mahajan, A.
(2000) Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying, and successive cyclicity. In U. Lutz, G. Müller, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Wh-scope marking (195–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C.
(2004) Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua, 114, 543–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Garrett, M. F.
(1967) Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 289–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohe, L., Schulz, P., & Müller, A.
(2011) How children „Copy” long-distance structures: The production of complex Wh-questions in German. Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 233–245.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(2008) Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gürel, A.
(2007) (Psycho)linguistic determinants of L1 attrition. In: B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer, & S. Dosterst (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) First language attrition of constraints on wh-scrambling: Does the second language have an effect? International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(1), 75–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, M. J.
(2005) The acquisition of English LD wh-questions by Basque/Spanish bilingual subjects in a school context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R.
(2001) Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H., & Putnam, M.
(2015) Syntactic restructuring in heritage grammars: Word order variation in Moundridge Schweitzer German. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(2), 180–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, T.
(2000) The w…construction: appositive or scope indicating? In: U. Lutz, G. Müller, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Wh-scope marking (249–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A. C. J., & Zuckerman, S.
(2000) The interaction between input and economy: Acquiring optionality in French wh-questions. Boston University Conference on Language Development. Proceedings (Vol. 24).Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Wittenberg, E.
in press). Linear grammar as a possible stepping-stone in the evolution of language. Psychon Bull Review.
Jakubowicz, C.
(2004) Is movement costly? Paper presented at The JEL conference (Journee d’Etudes Linguistiques), Nantes.
(2005) The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, Siena.
(2011) Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua, 121(3), 339–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Strik, N.
(2008) Scope-marking strategies in the acquisition of long distance wh-questions in French and Dutch. Language and Speech, 51(1&2), 101–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M.
(1985) Syntactic and morphological progression in learner English. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, J.
(2009) Embracing edges: syntactic and phono-syntactic edge sensitivity in Nupe. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, 305–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G.
(2015) Rare phenomena revealing basic syntactic mechanisms: The case of unexpected verb-object sequences in Mennonite Low German. In A. Adli, M. García García & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Variation in Language: System-and Usage-based Approaches, 50 (113–146). Berlin/Boston: Walter De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. -H., Montrul, S., & Yoon, J.
(2009) Binding interpretation of anaphors in Korean heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 16, 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keel, W. D.
(2006) Deitsch, Däätsch, Düütsch, and Dietsch: the varieties of Kansas German dialects after 150 years of German group settlement in Kansas. In J. R. Brown & L. Hopkins (Eds.), Preserving Heritage: A Festschrift for C. Richard Beam (27–48). Society for German-American Studies with the support of the Max Kade Center for German-American Studies and the Joyce and Elizabeth Hall Center for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Köpke, B.
(2007) Language attrition at the crossroads of brain, mind, and society. In B. Köpke, M. S. Schmid, M. Keijzer, & S. Dostert (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (9–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B., & Schmid, M. S.
(2004) Language attrition. First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, 28(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J.
(2016) Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. & Phillips, C.
(2015) Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(1), 27–46, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J. M., De La Fuente, A. A., & Walsh, L.
(2011) Complex wh-questions in non-native Spanish and non-native German: Does input matter. Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 139–149.Google Scholar
Marantz, A.
(2005) Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review, 22, 429–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, J.
(1979) Model-theoretic semantics and transformational grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (184–226). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D.
(1986) Conditions on wh-chains. PhD dissertation, City University of New York (CUNY).Google Scholar
(1989) Partial and multiple wh-extraction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 565–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., Chiu, B., & Maxfield, T.
(1995) Parameters for wh-movement types: evidence from child English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 709–753. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L.
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moelleken, W. W.
(1987) Die rußlanddeutschen Mennoniten in Kanada und Mexiko: sprachliche Entwicklung und diglossische Situation. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 145–183.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2002) Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 5(01), 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Incomplete acquisition of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage language speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 239–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Peripñán, S.
(2008) Knowledge of wh-movement in Spanish L2 learners and heritage speakers. In M. Almazán, J. Bruhn de Garavito, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (93–106). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Odlin, T.
(1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M.
(2001) The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and and non-heritage learners of Korean as a second language: A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education, 12, 283–294.Google Scholar
Pascual, D. y Cabo, D., & Gómez Soler, I.
(2015) Preposition stranding in Spanish as a heritage language. Heritage Language Journal, 12(2), 186–209.Google Scholar
Pascual, D. y Cabo, D. & Rothman, J.
(2012) The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Jarvis, S.
(2002) Bidirectional transfer. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 190–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J. W.
(2007) PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.
(1996) Order and structure. Unpublished PhD thesis, MIT, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Pires, A. & Rothman, J.
(2009) Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 211–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(2006) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
(2008) Heritage language narratives. In D. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education. A new field emerging (149–164). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009) What breaks in A- and A-bar chains under incomplete acquisition. Poster, presentation at CUNY Sentence Process Conference. UC Davis 2009.Google Scholar
(2011) Reanalysis in adult heritage language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
(2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 368–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Quirk, E.
(2014) Second language acquisition of English questions: An elicited production study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(06), 1055–1086. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., Strik, N., & Tuller, L.
(2014) Wh-questions in child L2 French: Derivational complexity and its interactions with L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input. Second Language Research, 30(2), 225–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Salmons, J.
(2013) Losing their (passive) voice: Syntactic neutralization in heritage German. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 233–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Sánchez, L.
(2013) What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? – A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Arnbjörnsdóttir, B.
(2015) Minimizing (interface) domains: The loss of long-distance binding in North American Icelandic. In B. R. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic heritage languages in North America: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings (203–223). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Salmons, J.
(2015) Multilingualism in the Midwest: How German has shaped (and still shapes) the Midwest. Middle West Review, 1(2), 29–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T.
(2013) Competing grammars in the comprehension of questions and relative clauses in L1 German-L2 English. In Cabrelli Amaro, J. et al.. (eds.). Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2013). (170–179). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2014) Variational Learning in L2: The Transfer of L1 Syntax and Parsing Strategies in the Interpretation of wh-questions by L1 German learners of L2 English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(4), 432–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reis, M.
(2000) On the parenthetical features of German was…w constructions and how to account for them. In U. Lutz, G. Müller, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Wh-scope marking (359–407). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, N.
(2010) Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Contiguity theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2007) Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Walker, N.
(2012) Comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish heritage speakers and L2 learners of Spanish. PhD Qualifying paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Sabel, J.
(2000) Partial wh-movement and the typology of wh-questions. In U. Lutz, G. Müller, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Wh-scope marking (409–446). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sawatzky, H. L.
(1986) Sie suchten eine Heimat: deutsch-mennonitische Kolonisierung in Mexiko, 1922–1984 (Vol. 35). NG Elwert.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S.
(2011) Language Attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S. & Köpke, B.
to appear). First language attrition and bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Schulz, B.
(2006) Wh-scope marking in English interlanguage grammars: Transfer and processing effects on the second language acquisition of complex wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
(2011) Syntactic creativity in second language English: wh-scope marking in Japanese-English interlanguage. Second Language Research, 27(3), 313–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slavkov, N.
(2009) The acquisition of complex wh-questions in the L2 English of Canadian French and Bulgarian speakers: Medial wh-constructions, inversion phenomena, and avoidance strategies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
(2015) Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers. Second Language Research, 31(2) 179–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2004) Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Date, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Pinning down the notion of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strik, N.
(2013) The acquisition of long distance wh-questions in L2 French. Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–15.Google Scholar
Thornton, R.
(1990) Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, CT, USA.Google Scholar
Tsang, W. I.
(2016) Acquisition of English number agreement: L1-Cantonese – L2-English – L3-French speakers versus L1-Cantonese – L2-English speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(5), 611–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yager, L.
(2016) Morphosyntactic variation and change in Wisconsin Heritage German. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Yager, L., Hellmold, N., Joo, H., Putnam, M., Rossi, E., Stafford, C., & Salmons, J.
(2015) New structural patterns in moribund grammar: Case marking in Heritage German. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H.
(1995) Converging evidence for the “acquisition–learning” distinction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 35–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Putnam, Michael T.
2020. Separating vs. shrinking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.