Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 6:2 (2020) ► pp. 180208
References

References

Abelin, Å., & Thorén, B.
(2017) The perceptual weight of word stress, quantity and tonal word accent in Swedish. In E. Babatsouli & D. Ingram (Eds.), Phonology in protolanguage and interlanguage (pp. 316–341). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D.
(1949) Teaching pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 3(5), 113–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
(2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Althén, A., Ballardini, K., Stjärnlöf, S. & Viberg, Å.
(2012) Mål 1 Lärobok. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Aurén, J. A.
(1869) Bidrag till svenska språkets ljudlära. Linköping.Google Scholar
Ballardini, K., Stjärnlöf, S., & Viberg, Å.
(1997) Nya Mål 1. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Bannert, R.
(1980) Svårigheter med svenskt uttal: Inventering och prioritering ( Praktisk Lingvistik nr 5 ). Lund: Institutionen för lingvistik. Lunds universitet.Google Scholar
(1987) From prominent syllables to a skeleton of meaning: a model of prosodically guided speech recognition the XIth ICPhS Tallinn . (pp. 73–76). The Institute of language and literature, The Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R.Google Scholar
Behne, D., Czigler, P. E., & Sullivan, K. P. H.
(1997) Swedish Quantity and Quality: A Traditional Issue Revisited. In R. Bannert, M. Heldner, K. Sullivan & P. Wretling (Eds.), Phonum 4 (pp. 81–83). Umeå: Department of Phonetics, Umeå University.Google Scholar
(1998) Perceived Swedish vowel quantity: effects of postvocalic consonant duration. In R. H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), The 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. (pp. 2291–2294). Sydney Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia, 30th November – 4th December 1998, ISCA Archive. Retrieved from http://​www​.isca​-speech​.org​/archive​/icslp​_1998
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2015) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.4.04. Retrieved from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Bruce, G.
(1977) Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elert, C.-C.
(1964) Phonologic Studies of Swedish Quantity. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fant, G., & Kruckenberg, A.
(1989) Preliminaries to the study of Swedish prose reading and reading style. STL-QPSR, 30(2), 1–80.Google Scholar
(1994) Notes on stress and word accent in Swedish. STL-QPSR, 35(2–3), 125–144.Google Scholar
Fasth, C., & Kannermark, A.
(1989) Goda grunder – Svenska för invandrare. Lund: Folkuniversitetets förlag.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E.
(1986) Segment duration in Danish words: Dependency on higher level phonological units. In R. Channon & L. Shockey (Eds.), In honor of Ilse Lehiste (pp. 53–73). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Garlén, C.
(1988) Svenskans fonologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Gårding, E.
(1979) Avvikande uttal – Analys och värdering. In Praktisk Lingvistik 1 (pp. 11–21). Lund: Department of linguistics, Lund University.Google Scholar
Gårding, E., Bannert, R., Bredvad-Jensen, A.-C., Bruce, G., & Nauclér, K.
(1974) Talar skåningarna svenska? In C. Platzack (Ed.), Svenskans beskrivning 8. Förhandlingar vid sammankomst för att dryfta frågor rörande svenskans beskrivning 8. (pp. 107–117). Lund: Department of Nordic Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
Hadding-Koch, K., & Abramson, A.
(1964) Duration versus spectrum in Swedish vowels: Some perceptual experiments. Studia Linguistica, 18(2), 94–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for english as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kjellin, O.
(1978) Svensk prosodi i praktiken. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H.
(1975) Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3(3), 129–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J.
(2015) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I.
(1976) Suprasegmental features of speech. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 225–239). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M.
(2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(2013) The foundations of accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44(3), 316–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, M.
(2016) Sveriges språk i siffror: vilka språk talas och av hur många? Stockholm: Morfem.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E.
(2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 191–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riad, T.
(1997) Svenskt fonologikompendium. Stockholm: Institutionen för svenska och flerspråkighet, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Slagbrand, Y., & Thorén, B.
(1997) Övningar i svensk basprosodi. Boden: Semikolon.Google Scholar
Thorén, B.
(2003) Can V/C-ratio alone be sufficient for discrimination of V:C/VC: in Swedish? A perception test with manipulated durations. In Heldner, M. (ed.), Proceedings from Fonetik 2003, Umeå University, 49–52.Google Scholar
(2005) The postvocalic consonant as a complementary cue to the perception of quantity in Swedish – a revisit. In A. Eriksson & J. Lindh (Eds.) Proceedings from Fonetik 2005, Gothenburg: Department of linguistics, Göteborg university, 115–118.Google Scholar
(2007) Funderingar och forskning kring en basprosodisk undervisningsstrategi för uttalsundervisning i svenska som andraspråk. In J. Lainio & A. Leppänen (eds), Språklig mångfald och hållbar samhällsutveckling. Rapport från ASLA:s höstsymposium Eskilstuna 9–10 november 2006. Swedish Science Press, Uppsala, 265–284.Google Scholar
(2008) The priority of temporal aspects in L2-Swedish prosody: Studies in perception and production (Doctoral thesis). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
(2010) Durations of phonologically long segments in native and foreign accented Swedish. In S. Schötz & G. Ambrazaitis (Eds.), Proceedings from Fonetik 2010 Lund, June 2–4 2010, 103–106.Google Scholar
Thorén, B. & Jeong, H.
(2016, June). Difference in L1 and L2 speakers’ realizations of Swedish phonological length. Paper presented at the New Sounds 2016, Aarhus, Denmark.
Traunmüller, H., & Bigestans, A.
(1988) Perception of the quantity distinction in Swedish /VC/-sequences. The Second Swedish Phonetics Conference. Lund: Lund University, 124–127.Google Scholar
Turner, J. L.
(2014) Using statistics in small-scale language education research: Focus on nonparametric data. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R., & Schönbrodt, F. D.
(2015) The WRS package for robust statistics in R (Version 0.27.5). Retrieved from https://​github​.com​/nicebread​/WRS