Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 3:1 (2002) ► pp. 130
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Archer, Dawn
2011. Facework and im/politeness across legal contexts: An introduction. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn
2011. Libelling Oscar Wilde: The case of Regina vs. John Sholto Douglas. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7:1 Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn, Karen Grainger & Piotr Jagodziński
2020.  In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn, Rebecca Smithson & Ian Kennedy
2018.  In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288],  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.  In Register, Genre, and Style, Crossref logo
Cecconi, Elisabetta
2008. Legal discourse and linguistic incongruities in Bardell vs. Pickwick: an analysis of address and reference strategies in The Pickwick Papers trial scene. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:3  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2011. In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:4  pp. 471 ff. Crossref logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2012. Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse & Society 23:5  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2018. Dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early courtroom action game. Language and Dialogue 8:3  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
Doty, Kathleen L.
2018.  In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
2009. Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics 41:3  pp. 458 ff. Crossref logo
Grund, Peter
2007. The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials1. Studia Neophilologica 79:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Jucker, A.H.
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena
2012. “I am a Gosple Woman”: On Language in the Courtroom Discourse during the Salem Witch Trials, with Special Reference to Female Examinees. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Kirk, John M.
2016. The Pragmatic Annotation Scheme of the SPICE-Ireland Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Puyu Ning
2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Mcintyre, Dan
2004. Point of View in Drama: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Dennis Potter’s Brimstone and Treacle. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 13:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
McIntyre, Dan
2020.  In The Language and Literature Reader,  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Petykó, Márton
2017. Discursive (re)construction of “witchcraft” as a community and “witch” as an identity in the eighteenth-century Hungarian witchcraft trial records. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 214 ff. Crossref logo
RISSANEN, MATTI
2003. SALEM WITCHCRAFT PAPERS AS EVIDENCE OF EARLY AMERICAN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 20:1  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Rissanen, Matti
2012. Power and Changing Roles in Salem Witch Trials: The Case of George Jacobs, Sr.. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
2009. Tag Questions in English. Journal of English Linguistics 37:2  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.