Article published in:
The Role of Pragmatics in Cyclic Language Change
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2] 2020
► pp. 182207
Sources

Sources

Brepolis: Brepolis Cross-Database Search tool, relaying the Brepolis Latin databases
MGH: Monumenta Germaniae Historica
Available online at: http://​www​.dmgh​.de/
TLFi
Trésor de la langue Française informatisé [‘Digitized Treasury of the French Language’]. Available online at: http://​atilf​.atilf​.fr
ATILF – CNRS and Université de Lorraine
TLIO: Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini

References

Adams, James N.
1976 “A Typological Approach to Latin Word Order”. Indogermanische Forschungen 81: 70–99.Google Scholar
2016An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 205 ]
Battisti, Carlo and Giovanni Alessio
1951Dizionario etimologico italiano [‘Italian Etymological Dictionary’]. Firenze: G. Barbèra.Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita
2018 “The Evolution of Temporal Adverbs into Consecutive Connectives and the Role of Discourse Tradition: The Case of It. allora and Sp. entonces ”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 232–270. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Linus
1936Entwicklung der Funktionen der lat. Konjunktion dum [‘Development of the Functions of Lat. Conjunction dum’]. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1886–1916Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen [‘Outline of the Comparative Grammar of the Indo-European Languages’]. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción
2002 “Grammaticalization and Category Weakness”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Reflections on Grammaticalization, 201–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortelazzo, Manlio and Paolo Zolli
1979–1988 deli: Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana [‘ deli: Etymological Dictionary of the Italian Language’]. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Cupaiuolo, Fabio
1967La formazione degli avverbi in latino [‘The Formation of Adverbs in Latin’]. Napoli: Libreria scientifica editrice.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 19–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek
1997Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara and Piera Molinelli
2019 “Italian ma ‘but’ in Deverbal Pragmatic Markers: Forms, Functions, and Productivity of a Pragma-dyad”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 26: 29–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Angela and Corinne Rossari
1994 “De donc à dunque et quindi: les connexions par raisonnement inférentiel” [‘From to dunque and quindi: Connections by Inferential Reasoning’]. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 15: 7–49.Google Scholar
Gaertner, Jan Felix
2007 “ Tum und tunc in der augusteischen Dichtersprache” [‘ Tum and tunc in the Augustan Poetic Language’]. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 150 (2): 211–224.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2011The Linguistic Cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Cyclical Change Continued. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli
2014 “Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. quaeso and It. prego): The Cyclic Nature of Functional Developments”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Politeness Markers from Latin to Italian. Periphery, Discourse Structure and Cyclicity”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 307–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “Connectives and Cyclicity: From the Latin Temporal Phrase illa hora to the Italian Discourse Marker allora ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (2): 209–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 206 ]
Godefroy, Frédéric
1881Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue française et de tous ses dialectes du IXe au XVe siècle [‘Dictionary of the Ancient French Language and All Its Dialects from the 9th to the 15th Century’]. Paris: F. Vieweg.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj–Britt Mosegaard
2014 “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: The Medieval Particle ja between Latin iam and Modern French déjà ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2018 “Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers. Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 51–77. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heberlein, Fritz
2011 “Temporal Clauses”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 4: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, 235–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herman, József
1963La formation du système roman des conjonctions de subordination [‘The Formation of the Romance System of Subordinating Conjunctions’]. Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist and Anton Szantyr
1965Lateinische Grammatik [‘Latin Grammar’]. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Jeffords, Clyde Raymond
1905 “ Dumque, dunque, dunc, donc ”: The New York Latin Leaflet VI (129): 1–2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael and Carl Stegmann
1966Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache [‘Detailed Grammar of the Latin Language’]. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T. and Charles Short
1958 [1891]A New Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna
1998 “Proposte per l’interpretazione del cambiamento fonologico in area romanza nel segno della non linearità” [‘Proposals for the Interpretation of Phonological Change in the Romance Area from a Non-linear Perspective’]. In Giovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza [‘Proceedings of the XXI International Conference of Romance Linguistics and Philology’]. Volume 1: Grammatica storica delle lingue romanze [‘Historical Grammar of Romance Languages’], 439–454. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
1968Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [‘Romance Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno and Aldo Duro
1958Prontuario etimológico della lingua italiana [‘Etymological Handbook of the Italian Language’]. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
Nocentini, Alberto
2010Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana [‘Etymological Dictionary of the Italian Language’]. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
2015The Oxford Latin Syntax. Volume 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 207 ]
Pirson, Jules
1901La langue des inscriptions latines de la Gaule [‘The Language of the Latin Inscriptions of Gaul’]. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide
2010 “Il sintagma avverbiale” [‘The Adverbial Phrase’]. In Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi (eds), Grammatica dell’italiano antico [‘Grammar of Ancient Italian’], 715–754. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
2009 “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-part Modification – the Contribution of Particles”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 1: Syntax of the Sentence, 317–344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stone, Robert C.
2009The Language of the Latin Text of Codex Bezae: With an Index Verborum. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Svennung, Josef
1935Untersuchungen zu Palladius and zur lateinischen Fach- und Volkssprache [‘Studies on Palladius and Technical and Vulgar Latin’]. Uppsala: Almqvist och Wiksell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel
2008Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold
1960Dizionario etimologico sardo [‘Sardinian Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Walde, Alois and Johann Baptist Hofmann
1982 [1822]Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch [‘Latin Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
von Wartburg, Walther
1922–1929Franzosisches etymologische Wörterbuch [‘French Etymological Dictionary’]. Bonn/Tübingen/Basel: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2020. Connectives and cyclicity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.