Introduction published in:
Exploring (im)politeness in ancient languages
Edited by Kim Ridealgh
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:2] 2019
► pp. 169185
References

References

Archer, Dawn
2017 “Context and Historical (Socio)pragmatics Twenty Years On”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 315–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel and Nanne Streekstra
2003 “Civil Rites: Ritual Politeness in Early Modern Dutch Letter-writing”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4 (2): 303–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
2011 “The Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)politeness: Introductory Notes”. In Marcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness: Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 1–24.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2005Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Bom, Isabelle and Karen Grainger
2015 “Journal of Politeness Research: An Introduction”. Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 165–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2017 ““Nwuna’s Body is So Sexy”: Pop Culture and the Chronotopic Formulations of Kinship Terms in Korean”. Discourse, Context and Media 15: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
1960 “Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Clercq, Trevor and David Temperley
2011 “A Corpus Analysis of Rock Harmony”. Popular Music 30 (1): 47–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2017 “The Influence of Italian Manners on Politeness in England, 1550–1620”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 195–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
1999 “Politeness and Ideology: A Critical Review”. Pragmatics 9 (1): 163–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Feezell, Jessica
2017 “It’s Not Only Rock and Roll: The Influence of Music Preferences on Political Attitudes”. In Uche Onyebadi (ed.), Music as a Platform for Political Communication, 167–186. Hershey: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Ersheng, Xiayun Zuo, Li Wang, Chaohua Zuo, Yan Cheng and Laurie Zabin
2016 “How Does Traditional Confucian Culture Influence Adolescents’ Behavior in Three Asian Cities”. Journal of Adolescent Health 50 (3): 12–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
1991 [1927]Being and Time. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua 8 (2–3): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janney, Richard and Arndt Horst
1993 “Universality and Relativity in Cross-cultural Politeness Research: A Historical Perspective”. Multilingua 12 (1): 13–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
2000 “ ‘Thou’ in the History of English: A Case for Historical Semantics or Pragmatics?” In Christiane Dalton-Puffer and Nikolaus Ritt (eds), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, 153–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. In Marcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)politeness–Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 178–197.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2010Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2017 “Politeness in Pragmatics”. Oxford Research Encyclopaedias: Linguistics (online), CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper
(eds) 2010Historical (Im)politeness. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills
2011 “Introduction”. In Dániel Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Tae Wan and Alan Strudler
2012 “Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach”. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3): 557–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence
1994 “ ‘Politeness’ as Linguistic Ideology in Late Seventeenth- and Early Eighteenth-Century England”. In Dieter Stein and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostede (eds), Towards a Standard English, 31–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2005 “Historical Linguistics: Corpus Linguistics, Text Linguistics and Historical Pragmatics”. In Stephan Kohl (ed.), Anglistik – Research Paradigms and Institutional Policies, 1930–2000, 271–292. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kopytko, Roman
1995 “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. In Andreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Development in the History of English, 515–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreyer, Rolf
2015 “ ‘Funky Fresh Dressed to Impress’: A Corpus-linguistic View on Gender Roles in Pop Songs”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 174–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurokawa, Shozo
1972 “Japanese Terms of Address: Some Usages of First and Second Person Pronouns”. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1 (2): 228–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Robert
1997Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Cher Leng
2012 “Self-presentation, Face and First-person Pronouns in the Analects”. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 75–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia H.
1995Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture and Translated Modernity, China. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne
2007 “A Pragmatics for Interpreting Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1 to 20: Dialogue Scripts and Erasmian Intertexts”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 167–183. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina
2000Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2003Socio-Historical Linguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. Longman: London.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity across Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakis, Valentin
2011 “Insults, Violence, and the Meaning of lytegian in the Old English Battle of Maldon ”. In Marcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness–Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 198–229.Google Scholar
Richter, Max M.
2008 “Musical Sexualisation and the Gendered Habitus in Yogyakarta”. Indonesia and the Malay World 36 (104): 21–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ridealgh, Kim
2016a “Polite like an Egyptian? Case Studies of Politeness in the Late Ramesside Letters”. Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 245–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2016bCase Studies in Historical Politeness (Ancient Languages) – Special Issue of Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2).Google Scholar
Ruhi, Śukriye and Dániel Z. Kádár
2011 “ ‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. In Marcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness – Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 25–48.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function”. In John A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East–West Debate”. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 73–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
2003Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics: Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unceta Gómez, Luis
2016 “Congratulations in Latin Comedy: Types and Functions”. Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
1992 “Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behaviour: Reconsidering Claims for Universality”. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wente, Edward
1990Letters from Ancient Egypt. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin
Ed. 2018The Language of Pop Culture. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ridealgh, Kim
2021. Talking to God: conceptualizing an alternative politeness approach for the human/divine relationship. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Ridealgh, Kim & L. Unceta Gómez
2020. Potestas and the language of power: Conceptualising an approach to Power and Discernment politeness in ancient languages. Journal of Pragmatics 170  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.