Article published in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp. 349388
References

[ p. 384 ]References

Akimoto, Minoje & Laurel J. Brinton
1999The Origin of the Composite Predicate in Old English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoje Akimoto, 21–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Réka & Albert-László Barabási
2002Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74.47–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, John
1995Having a Look at the Expanded Predicate. The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description ed. by Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allerton, David J.
2003Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald
2009Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 2 ed. by Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László
2016Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Johanna
2008Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Approach. Lingua 121:1.60–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea
2015Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications. Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Johanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 1–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2005Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonial, Claire Nicole
2014Take a Look at This! Form, Function and Productivity of English Light Verb Constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA).Google Scholar
Bonial, Claire, Julia Bonn, Kathryn Conger, Jena Hwang, Martha Palmer & Nicholas Reese
2015PropBank Annotation Guidelines. Center for Computational Language and Education Research: University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire
2008The Diachrony of Complex Predicates. Diachronica 25.161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008Where Grammar and Lexis Meet: Composite Predicates in English. Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization ed. by Elena Seoane, María José López-Couso & Teresa Fanego, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Minoji Akimoto
eds. 1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 385 ]
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner & Victor Kuperman
2014Concreteness Ratings for Forty-Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 46:3.904–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003The Light Verb Jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9.1–49.Google Scholar
2010The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away. Complex Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective ed. by Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri
2013Diachronic Pertinacity of Light Verbs. Lingua 135.7–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: An Inquiry into the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:1.425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language 82:4.711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & David Eddington
2006A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming’. Language 82:2.323–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Steve
2002Skousen’s Analogical Approach as an Exemplar-Categorization. Analogical Modeling ed. by Royal Skousen & Deryle B. Parkinson, 51–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Wei-Te, Claire Bonial & Martha Palmer
2015English Light Verb Construction Identification Using Lexical Knowledge. Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. URL: https://​www​.aaai​.org​/ocs​/index​.php​/AAAI​/AAAI15​/paper​/viewPaper​/9925
Claridge, Claudia
2000Multi-Word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V.
1995The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William A. Croft
1997Productivity and Schematicity in Metaphors. Cognitive Science 21:3.247–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2010The Corpus of Historical American English. URL: https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coha/
Elenbaas, Marion
2013The Synchronic and Diachronic Status of English Light Verbs. Linguistic Variation 13.48–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fazly, Afsaneh
2007Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge about Multiword Predicates. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
1998WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. URL: https://​wordnet​.princeton​.edu/. Crossref
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck
2002Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16:3.235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gárate, Teresa Moralejo
2003Composite Predicates in Middle English. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 386 ]
Hilpert, Martin
2017Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives ed. by Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 387 ]
Hiltunen, R.
1999Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laural Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt & Joybrato Mukherjee
2011Indian English: An Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-Derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 129:3–4.258–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, L.
2001Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken . Studia Neophilologica 73:143–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Scott
2013Capturing the Diversity in Lexical Diversity. Language Learning 63:87–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1942A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith
1997Speech Perception without Speaker Normalization: An Exemplar Model. Talker Variability in Speech Processing ed. by Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein
1997Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Doctoral Thesis, Essex University, England.Google Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander
2015Using the Parameters of the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law to Measure Diachronic, Lexical, Syntactical, and Stylistic Changes: A Large-Scale Corpus Analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1.1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krenn, Brigitte
2000The Usual Suspects: Data-Oriented Models for Identification and Representation of Lexical Collocations. Doctoral Dissertation, Saarland University, Saarbrücken (Germany).Google Scholar
Kunegis, Jérôme, Marcel Blattner & Christine Moser
2013Preferential Attachment in Online Networks: Measurement and Explanations. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 205–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja
1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Verbs in Early Modern English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laporte, Samantha
2017Light Verb Constructions in Second-Language Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Nativization in Hong Kong English. Paper presented at Light Verb Constructions in Germanic Languages, Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles, November 2017.
Live, Anna H.
1973The Take-Have Phrasal in English. Linguistics 95.31–50.Google Scholar
Magurran, Anne
2013Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Meiko
1999Composite Predicates in Middle English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, David
2015Type-Token Models: A Comparative Study. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 22:1.1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto, Tadao
2000The Light Verb Construction in Japanese: the Role of the Verbal Noun. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nosofsky, Robert M.
1988Similarity, Frequency, and Category Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14.54–65.Google Scholar
Ninio, Anat
1999Pathbreaking Verbs in Syntactic Development and the Question of Prototypical Transitivity. Journal of Child Language 26.619–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
North, Ryan
2005Computational Measures of the Acceptability of Light Verb Constructions. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert
2017A Distributional Semantic Approach to the Periodization of Change in the Productivity of Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22.490–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2002Word-specific Phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner, 101–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigney, Daniel
2010The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia
2012Make Peace and Take Victory: Support Verb Constructions in Old English in Comparison with Old Irish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Light Verb Constructions in the History of English. Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns ed. by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte, 15–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ronan, Patricia & Gerold Schneider
2015Determining Light Verb Constructions in Contemporary British and Irish English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20.326–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shahrokny-Prehn, Arian & Silke Höche
2011Rising through the Registers: A Corpus-based Account of the Stylistic Constraints on Light Verb Constructions. Corpus 10.239–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe
1840A Defence of Poetry. Essays, Letters from Abroad, Translations and Fragments ed. by Mary Shelley, 1–57. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Suzanne, Afsaneh Fazly & Ryan North
2004Statistical Measures of the Semi-Productivity of Light Verb Constructions. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Integrating Processing, 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, John D.
2018A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:3.260–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 388 ]
Sundquist, J. D.
2020The Rich Get Richer: Preferential Attachment and the Diachrony of Light Verbs in Old Swedish. Historical Linguistics 2017 ed. by Bridget Drinka, 344–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, Laura & Adele E. Goldberg
2011The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction. Linguistics 49:6.1237–1269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanabe, Harumi
1999Composite Predicates and Phrasal Verbs in the Paston Letters. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 87–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1999A Historical Overview of Complex Predicate Types. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tu, Yuancheng & Dan Roth
2011Learning English Light Verb Constructions: Contextual or Statistical. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: from Parsing and Generation to the Real World, 31–39. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tweedie, Fiona J. & R. Harald Baayen
1998How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32:5.323–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar