Article published in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp. 427451
References

References

Balon, Lauren & Pierre Larrivée
2016L’Ancien français n’est déjà plus une langue à sujet nul. Nouveau témoignage des textes légaux. Journal of French Language Studies 26:2.221–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Battye, Adrian & Ian Roberts
eds. 1995Introduction. Clause Structure and Language Change. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013Does Innovation Need Reanalysis? Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change ed. by Hendrik De Smet, Evie Coussé & Ferdinand Von Mengden, 23–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 448 ]
Déprez, Viviane
2000Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of n-words. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18.253–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drenhaus, Heiner, Joanna Błaszczak & Juliane Schütte
2007Some Psycholinguistic Comments on NPI Licensing. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 ed. by Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 180–193. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas
2003Context, Culture and Structuration in the Languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32.13–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
2000In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language 76:3.546–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1919Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Negative… Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18.457–523. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006N-words and Negative Concord. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol. 3, ed. by Martin Everaert, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The Dynamics of Change in Dutch enig: From Nonveridicality to Strong Negative Polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28:4.861–875. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara
2016Indefinites 
between Latin and Romance. Habilitation dissertation, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2011On the Evolution of Temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences 34.76–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The History of Negation in French. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean vol. 1: Case Studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 5–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–102. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
1994On the Grammaticalization of Negative Polarity Items. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolbey & Christopher Johnson, 273–82. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2009Jespersen Recycled. Cyclical Change, ed. by Elly Van Gelderen, 15–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Dutch enig: From Nonveridicality to Downward Entailment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28:4.837–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 449 ]
2011Discourse Scalarity: The Case of Dutch helemaal . Journal of Pragmatics 43.2810–2825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2011Grammar Change in Anglo-Norman and Continental French: The Replacement of Non-assertive Indefinite nul by aucun . Diachronica 28:4.441–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallel, Amel & Richard Ingham
2014Evidence from a Correspondence Corpus for Diachronic Change in French Indefinites 1450–1715. The Diachrony of Negation ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti, 213–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie & Maria Teresa Espinal
2014Diachronic Changes in Negative Expressions: The Case of French. Lingua 145.194–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2004L’association négative : depuis la syntaxe jusqu’à l'interprétation. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
2014aPathways of Evolution of n-words: Functions, Features, and Bridging Contexts. Paper presented at the international workshop Negation: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 18–19 December 2014.
2014bL’unidirectionalité irréversible du changement linguistique comme conséquence de l’acquisition? Le cas d’expressions négatives déliquescentes en français ancien. CMLF 2014, 297–312.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre & Richard Ingham
2012Variation, Change and the Status of Negatives in Peripheral Varieties of Old French: The Case of néant . Studies in Honour of Professor R. Anthony Lodge ed. by Dominique Lagorgette & Tim Pooley, 99–112. Chambéry: Presses universitaires de Savoie.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. Anthony
1993French, from Dialect to Standard. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2017Quelle place accorder à l’opposition Récit / « Oral représenté » dans la description de l’évolution du français? La mise à l’écrit et ses conséquences. Actes du troisième colloque « Repenser l’histoire du français », Université de Neuchâtel, 5–6 juin 2014 ed. by Andres M. Kristol, 85–108. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Martineau, France & Viviane Déprez
2004 Pas rien/Pas aucun en français classique. Variation dialectale et historique. Langue francaise 143.33–47.Google Scholar
Muller, Claude
2009Une cartographie des indéfinis free choice du français. Syntaxe et sémantique 10.65–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie & Catherine Schnedecker
2004 Aucun(e)(s)/d’aucun(e)(s)/les aucun(e)(s): évolution du français médiéval au français moderne. Scolia 8.39–73.Google Scholar
Schøsler, Lene
2002La variation linguistique: le cas de l’expression du sujet. Interpreting the History of French: A Festschrift for Peter Rickard on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday ed. by Rodney Sampson & Wendy Ayres-Bennett, 195–212. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2012aPragmatics and Language Change. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Keith Allan & Kasia Jaszczolt, 549–565. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bOn the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Contexts over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-changes. Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee & Magnus Hÿber, 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 450 ]
van Alsenoy, Lauren
2014A New Typology of Indefinite Pronouns, with a Focus on Negative Indefinites. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2010On the Diachrony of Negation. The Expresssion of Negation ed. by Laurence R. Horn, 73–101. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vanderheyden, Anne
2012Dire la ‘singularité’ indéterminée’. Le paradigme de quelqu’un en ancien français. Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique ed. by Bernard Combettes, Céline Guillot, Alexei Lavrentiev, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux & Sophie Prévost, 357–376. Peter Lang: Bern.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Willian Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Helmut
2002Indefinite Pronouns. Morphology and Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Pronouns: Grammar and Representation ed. by Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese, 85–107. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, David
2012Negative Polarity and the Quantifier Cycle: Comparative Perspectives from European Languages. The Evolution of Negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle ed. by Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham, 313–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016Endogenous and Exogenous Theories of Syntactic Change. Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax ed. by Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts, 491–514. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Junhui, Qingshun He & Guangwu Feng
2016Rethinking the Grammaticalization of Future be going to: A Corpus-Based Approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 23:4.317–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles
2000Internal and External Forces in Language Change. Language Variation and Change 12:3.231–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Three Factors in Language Variation. Lingua 120:5.1160–1177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde H.
2011On the Syntactically Complex Status of Negative Indefinites. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14.111–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1998Three Types of Polarity. Plurality and Quantification ed. by Fritz Hamn & Erhard Hinrichs, 177–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar