Article published in:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 1:2 (2020) ► pp. 184194
References

References

Basken, P.
(2017) Why Beallʼs list died. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://​www​-chronicle​-com​.proxy​.lib​.sfu​.ca​/article​/Why​-Beall​-s​-List​-Died-​/241171
Beall, J.
(2010) Update: Predatory open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 12 (1), 50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489 (7415), 179–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beall, J., & DuBois, J. M.
(2016) Scholars beware predatory publishers are increasingly targeting psychologists and other social scientists. Monitor on Psychology, 47 (4), 42.Google Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
Berger, M., & Cirasella, J.
(2015) Beyond Beall’s list: Better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76 (3), 132–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, J.
(2013) Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342 (6154), 60–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D.
(2013) Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495 (7442), 433–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S.
(2002) A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2013) English for academic purposes. In B. Paltridge and S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, (pp. 137–154). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Grudniewicz, A., Lalu, M. M., Rice, D. B., Raffoul, H., & Moher, D.
(2019) Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey. BMJ Open, 9 (3), 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, W.
(2011) Open access: what you need to know now. American Library Association.Google Scholar
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M.
(2004) Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4), 663–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2017) Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives, and pedagogies. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
da Silva, J. A. T.
(2017) Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: They are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate. Bibliothecae.it, 6 (1), 425–436.Google Scholar
da Silva, J. A. T., & Tsigaris, P.
(2020) Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46 (1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Demir, S. B.
(2018) Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12 (4), 1296–1311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djuric, D.
(2014) Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: The Romanian connection. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21 (1), 183–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ezinwa Nwagwu, W., & Ojemeni, O.
(2015) Penetration of Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007–2012: A bibliometric study. Learned Publishing, 28 (1), 23–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, I., & Heng Hartse, J.
(2017) Reconsidering “predatory” open access journals in an age of globalized English language academic publishing. In M. J. Curry & T. M. Lillis (Eds.), Global academic publishing: Policies, practices, and pedagogies (pp. 200–213). Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
(2013) English for research publication purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 301–321). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2015) Some thoughts on English for research publication purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Language Teaching, 48 (2), 250–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2015) Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2020) Peer review: Objective screening or wishful thinking? The Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 1 (1), 51–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 193 ]
Kimotho, S. G.
(2019) The storm around Beall’s List: A review of issues raised by Beall’s critics over his criteria of identifying predatory journals and publishers. African Research Review, 13 (2), 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurt, S.
(2018) Why do authors publish in predatory journals?. Learned Publishing, 31 (2), 141–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McQuarrie, F. A., Kondra, A. Z., & Lamertz, K.
(2020) Do tenure and promotion policies discourage publications in predatory journals?. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51 (3), 165–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millard, W. B.
(2013) Some research wants to be free, some follows the money: Bogus journals complicate the open access movement. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 62 (2), 14A–20A. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., … & Daniel, R.
(2017) Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549 (7670), 23–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omobowale, A. O., Akanle, O., Adeniran, A. I. & Adegboyega, K.
(2014) Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria. Current Sociology, 62 (5), 666–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
(2020) Writing for academic journals in the digital era. RELC Journal, 51 (1), 147–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F.
(2008) Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 , 121–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13 , 78–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salehi, M., Soltani, M., Tamleh, H., & Teimournezhad, S.
(2020) Publishing in predatory open access journals: Authors’ perspectives. Learned Publishing, 33 (2), 89–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shehata, A. M. K., & Elgllab, M. F. M.
(2018) Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap. Learned Publishing, 31 (3), 222–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, C., & Björk, B.
(2015) ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13 , 230–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siler, K.
(2020) Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Soler, J., & Cooper, A.
(2019) Unexpected emails to submit your work: Spam or legitimate offers? The implications for novice English L2 writers. Publications, 7 (1), 7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1996) Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45–58). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K.
(2013) Librarian vs. (open access) predator: An interview with Jeffrey Beall. Serials Review, 39 (2), 125–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 194 ]
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R. & Howard, H. A.
(2015) Who publishes in ‘predatory’ journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (7), 1406–1417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar