Article published in:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 1:2 (2020) ► pp. 92119
References

References

Becher, T.
(1989) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P.
(2001) Academic tribes and territories. Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A.
(2005) Writing the qualitative dissertation: what motivates and sustains commitment to a fuzzy genre? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 , 187–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B.
(1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20 (2), 157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A., & Fleischer, C.
(2019) Becoming a writing researcher. (2nd ed.). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bondi, M., & Lorés-Sanz, R.
(Eds.) (2014) Abstracts in academic discourse. Variation and change. Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, S.
(2013) Qualitative interviewing. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cao, F., & Hu, G.
(2014) Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66 , 15–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
(1987) Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society, 85 (1), 110–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U.
(2011) Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W.
(2012) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
[ p. 114 ]
Curry, M. J., Lillis, T.
(2019) Unpacking the lore on multilingual scholars publishing in English: A discussion paper. Publications, 7 (2), 27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, K.
(2012) Variation of stance and voice across cultures. In K. Hyland et al. (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 218–231). Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T.
(2006) Academic voices. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T.
(Eds.) (2017) Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Garton, S., & Copland, F.
(2010) ‘I like this interview; I get cakes and cats!’: The effect of prior relationships on interview talk. Qualitative Research, 10 (5), 533–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A.
(1984) The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity.Google Scholar
Gnutzmann, C., & Rabe, F.
(2014) “Theoretical subtleties” or “text modules”? German researchers’ language demands and attitudes across disciplinary cultures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13 , 31–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2015) Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Habibie, P., & Hyland, K.
(Eds.) (2019) Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N.
(2009) An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (3), 497–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B.
(2012) Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers. Written Communication, 29 (1), 55–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2011) Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistic articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 , 2795–2809. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39 , 12–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.Google Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31 , 58–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F.
(2016) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33 (3), 251–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M.
(2017) “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30 , 53–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J., & Mauranen, A.
(Eds.) (2019) Linguistic diversity. Insider accounts of the use of English and other languages in universities within Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.
(1966) Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16 , 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, K., & McGrath, L.
(2019) Revisiting the role of ‘discipline’ in writing for publication in two social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40 , 115–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S.
(2009) InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Lakić, I., Vuković, M., & Živković, B.
(2015) Academic discourse across cultures. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
[ p. 115 ]
Lancaster, Z.
(2016) Using corpus results to guide the discourse-based interview: A study of one student’s awareness of stance in academic writing in philosophy. Journal of Writing Research, 8 (1), 119–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M.
(2015) Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39 , 45–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R.
(2016) ELF in the making? simplification and hybridity in abstract writing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 5 (1), 53–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics. Vol. 2 . Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S.
(1994) Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Manathunga, C., & Brew, A.
(2014) Beyond tribes and territories: New metaphors for new times. In P. Trowler, S. Murray, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st-century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education (pp. 44–56). Routledge.Google Scholar
Martín-Martín, P.
(2008) The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8 (2), 133–152.Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P., & Ŝinkūi̇enė, J.
(Eds.) (2018) Intercultural perspectives on research writing. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A.
(1983) The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 221–236). Longman.Google Scholar
Olinger, A. R.
(2014) On the instability of disciplinary style: Common and conflicting metaphors and practices in text, talk, and gesture. Research in the teaching of English, 48 (4), 453–478.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petrić, B., & Harwood, N.
(2013) Task requirements, task representation, and self-reported citation functions: An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12 , 110–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shchemeleva, I.
(2019) “It seems plausible to maintain that…”: Clusters of epistemic stance expressions in written academic ELF texts. ESP Today, 7 (1), 24–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silver, M.
(2012) Voice and stance across disciplines in academic discourse. In K. Hyland, & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 202–217). Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tribble, C.
(2017) ELFA vs. Genre: A new paradigm war in EAP writing instruction? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25 , 30–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trowler, P.
(2014a) Depicting and researching disciplines: Strong and moderate essentialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39 , 1720–1731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: Conceptual groundwork. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education (pp. 5–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D.
(2019) Academic writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vassileva, I.
(2001) Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (1), 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 116 ]
Vold, E. T.
(2006b) Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and crossdisciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 61–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., & Jiang, F.
(2018) Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing: Hedges, boosters and self-mentions across disciplines and writer groups. In P. Mur-Dueñas, & J. Ŝinkūi̇enė (Eds.), Intercultural perspectives on research writing (pp. 195–216). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, L.
(2012) Rhetorical strategies and genre conventions in literary studies: Teaching and writing in the disciplines. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L.
(2020) Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43 , 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Shchemeleva, Irina
2021. “There’s No Discrimination, These Are Just the Rules of the Game”: Russian Scholars’ Perception of the Research Writing and Publication Process in English. Publications 9:1  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.