Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 21:3 (2020) ► pp. 303328
References

References

Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., … & Schaller, M.
(2006) They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry) from out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17(10), 836–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Admoni, H., Hayes, B., Feil-Seifer, D., Ullman, D., & Scassellati, B.
(2013) Dancing With Myself: The effect of majority group size on perceptions of majority and minority robot group members. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 35, No. 35).Google Scholar
Bartneck, C., Van Der Hoek, M., Mubin, O., & Al Mahmud, A.
(2007, March). “Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do!” switching off a robot. In 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 217–222). IEEE.Google Scholar
Biernat, M., & Manis, M.
(1994) Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T.
(1958) Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J.
(2016) Culture and human-robot interaction in militarized spaces: A war story: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F., Alves-Oliveira, P., Maia, N., Ribeiro, T., Petisca, S., Melo, F. S., & Paiva, A.
(2016, August). Just follow the suit! trust in human-robot interactions during card game playing. In 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 507–512). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F., Mascarenhas, S., Prada, R., Melo, F. S., & Paiva, A.
(2018, February). Group-based emotions in teams of humans and robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 261–269). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M. R.
(1988, May). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 789–795). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 65–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eyssel, F., De Ruiter, L., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., & Hegel, F.
(2012, March). ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 125–126). IEEE.Google Scholar
Fraune, M. R., Kawakami, S., Šabanović, S., De Silva, R., & Okada, M.
(2015) Three’s company, or a crowd?: The effects of robot number and behavior on HRI in Japan and the USA. Robotics: Science and Systems.Google Scholar
Fraune, M. R., Šabanović, S., Smith, E. R., Nishiwaki, Y., & Okada, M.
(2017, March). Threatening flocks and mindful snowflakes: How group entitativity affects perceptions of robots. In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI (pp. 205–213). IEEE.Google Scholar
Fraune, M. R., & Šabanović, S.
(2014, August). Negative attitudes toward minimalistic robots with intragroup communication styles. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1116–1121). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraune, M. R., Šabanović, S., & Smith, E. R.
(2017) Teammates first: Favoring ingroup robots over outgroup humans. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1432–1437). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraune, M. R., Sherrin, S., Šabanović, S., & Smith, E. R.
(2015, March). Rabble of robots effects: Number and type of robots modulates attitudes, emotions, and stereotypes. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 109–116). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M.
(2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Pettigrew, T. F.
(2014) With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69(7), 669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S.
(2014) Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., & Bain, P.
(2008) Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1), 55–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A.
(2010) Influence and leadership. Handbook of Social Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Insko, C. A., Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., Hong, G.-Y., Slim, R. M., Dalton, B., … Bernthal, P. R.
(1988) Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(6), 505–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., & Cohen, T. R.
(2013) Interindividual–intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner’s dilemma game: How common fate, proximity, and similarity affect intergroup competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 168–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Judd, C. M., & Park, B.
(1988) Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S.
(2012) “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H., Reichert, A. L., Gary, H. E., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., … & Gill, B.
(2011, March). The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. In 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 159–160). IEEE.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S.
(2012) Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., Bobinger, S., & Neufeld, M.
(2013) When a Robot’s Group Membership Matters. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3), 409–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. L., & Lau, I. Y. M.
(2011, March). Hitting a robot vs. hitting a human: is it the same?. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 187–188). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leidner, B., & Castano, E.
(2012) Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 82–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leite, I., McCoy, M., Lohani, M., Ullman, D., Salomons, N., Stokes, C., … & Scassellati, B.
(2015, March). Emotional storytelling in the classroom: Individual versus group interaction between children and robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 75–82). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L.
(1994) Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 305–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loughnan, S., & Haslam, N.
(2007) Animals and androids implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychological Science, 18(2), 116–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nass, C., Fogg, B., & Moon, Y.
(1996) Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 669–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.
(2017) Robot Reincarnation. Life in Post-Bubble Japan, 153.Google Scholar
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y.
(1991) Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, M.
(2015) A Funeral for ‘Aibo’Robot Dogs at a Temple Near Tokyo.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C.
(1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S.
(1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S.
(2001) If you can’t join them, beat them: effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M.
(2010) Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 383–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wullenkord, R., Fraune, M. R., Eyssel, F., & Šabanović, S.
(2016) Getting in touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 980–985). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fraune, Marlena R.
2020. Our Robots, Our Team: Robot Anthropomorphism Moderates Group Effects in Human–Robot Teams. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.