References

References

Baumann, A. & Sommerer, L.
(2018) Linguistic diversification as a long-term effect of asymmetric priming: an adaptive-dynamics approach. Language Dynamics and Change, 2(8): 253–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, G. J., Blythe, R. A., Croft, W., & McKane, A. J.
(2006) Utterance selection model of language change. Physical Review E 73: 046118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, R. A., & Croft, W.
(2012) S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language, 88(2): 269–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J.
(1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Darwin, Ch.
(1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, L.
(2015) The Old English to-dative construction. English Language and Linguistics, 19: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dediu, D., Cysouw, M., Levinson, S. C., Baronchelli, A., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Evans, N., Garrod, S., Gray, R. S., Kandier, A., & Lieven, E.
(2013) Cultural evolution of language. In P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion. Strüngmann forum reports (pp. 303–332). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubossarsky, H., Weinshall, D. & Grossman, E.
(2016) Verbs change more than nouns: a bottom-up computational approach to semantic change. Lingue e Linguaggio, 15(1): 5–25.Google Scholar
Fonteyn, L. & Van de Pol, N.
(2016) Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2): 185–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
(2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13: 403–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Hilpert, M.
(2010) Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: a multi-factorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3): 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, E. & Polis, S.
(2017) Overall borrowing and borrowing in basic vocabulary: a typological perspective on lexical change in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic. Paper presented at 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE 2017) , Zürich.
Harrell, F. E. Jr.
2015) Regression modeling. Strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. & May, S.
2008) Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time-to-event data. New York: John Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 136 ]
Kassambara, A., Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P.
(2019) survminer: drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=survminer
Koplenig, A.
(2017) Why the quantitative analysis of diachronic corpora that does not consider the temporal aspect of time-series can lead to wrong conclusions. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(1): 159–168.Google Scholar
Koplenig, A. & Müller-Spitzer, C.
(2016) Population size predicts lexical diversity, but so does the mean sea level – why it is important to correctly account for the structure of temporal data. PLoS One, 11(3): e0150771. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1994) Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lass, R.
(1997) Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, A.
(1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A.
(2011) Cultural evolution. How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, A.
(1998) Nineteenth-century linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
(2014) Grammatical change begins within the word: causal modeling of the co-evolution of Icelandic morphology and syntax. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36: 2657–2662.Google Scholar
Pagel, M., Atkinson, Q. D. & Meade, A.
(2007) Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature, 449(7163): 717–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, P. & Van de Velde, F.
(2018) The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4): 867–901. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustet, R.
(2004) Zipf and his heirs. Language Sciences 26: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R: R Core Team
(2019R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Ritt, N.
(2004) Selfish Sounds: a Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, M.
(2013)  Tornar and volver: the interplay of frequency and semantics in compound tense auxiliary selection in Medieval and Classical Spanish. In: E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal & M. Cennamo (Eds.), Argument structure in flux. The Naples-Capri papers (pp. 435–458). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Modeling frequency effects in language change. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: frequency effects in language (175–207). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, M. & Van de Velde, F.
(2020) On cause and correlation in language change. Word order and clefting in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Dynamics and Change, 10, 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 137 ]
Steels, L.
(2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Review, 8: 339–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Do languages evolve or merely change? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43: 199–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Therneau, T. M.
(2015) Survival: a package for survival analysis in S. Version 2.38. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=survival
Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M.
(2000) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, F. & Petré, P.
(2020) Historical linguistics. In D. Knight & S. Adolphs (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (328–359). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, G.
(2012) Why language change is not (language) evolution. University of Manchester FiL 3 November (2012 Slides available at: http://​walkden​.space​/Walkden​_2012​_evo​.pdf
Wickham, H., Romain, F., Henry, L. & Müller, K.
(2020) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.8.4. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=dplyr
Wolk, Chr., Bresnan, J., Rosenbach, A. & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2013) Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica, 30(3): 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, R.
(2017) Formal and quantitative approaches to the study of syntactic change: Three case studies from the history of English. PhD Diss., Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
(1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. New York: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Van de Velde, Freek & Isabeau De Smet
2021. Markov Models for Multi-state Language Change. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.