Article published in:
Lexical Issues in the Architecture of the Language Faculty
Edited by Andrea Padovan
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:1] 2020
► pp. 3055
References

References

Amaral, L., Maia, M., Nevins, A., & Roeper, T.
(Eds.) (2018) Recursion across Domains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A.
(2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, N., & Vieu, L.
(2005) Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua, 115, 591–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axel-Tober, K.
(2012) (Nicht-)Kanonische Nebensätze im Deutschen. Synchrone und Diachrone Aspekte. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Guyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The development of the declarative complementizer in German. Language 93(2), e29–e65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 52 ]
Comrie, B., & Horie, K.
(1995) Complement clauses vs. relative clauses: some Khmer evidence. In W. Abraham et al. (Eds.), Discourse grammar and typology, (pp. 65–75). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancy, S.
(2011) Grammaticalization and syntax: A Functional view. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, (pp. 365–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, B.
(1909) Zu den germanischen Relativsätzen. Abhandlungen der phil.-hist. Klasse der königlich sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 27, 675–697.Google Scholar
Deutscher, G.
(2009) Nominalization and the origin of subordination. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (Eds.), Syntactic complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution, (pp. 199–214). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2019) Preposed adverbial clauses: Functional adaptation and diachronic inheritance. In K. Schmidtke-Bode et al. (Eds.), Explanations in Linguistic Typology: Diachronic Sources, Functional Motivations and the Nature of the Evidence, (pp. 191–226). Leipzig: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L.
(2005) Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã. Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, J. T.
(2004) The Syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, G. & Weiß, H.
(2011) >Al die wîle und ich lebe<. Und nicht nur koordinierend. In E. Breindl, G. Ferraresi & A. Volodina (Eds.), Satzverknüpfung mehrdimensional. Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, (pp. 79–106). Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, L.
(2012) On Case and Clauses: Subordination and the Spell-Out of nonterminals. In B. Surányi & D. Varga (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Central European Conference in Linguistics for postgraduate Students, (pp. 82–103). Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic UniversityGoogle Scholar
Fritz, M.
(2002) IV. Zur Syntax des Urindogermanischen. In M. Meier-Brügger (Ed.), Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. 8., völlig neubearbeitete Auflage der früheren Darstellung von Hans Krahe. Unter Mitarbeit von Matthias Fritz und Manfred Mayrhofer, (pp. 241–280). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Futrell, R., Stearns, L., Everett, D. L., Piantadosi, S. T. & Gibson, E.
(2016) A Corpus Investigation of Syntactic Embedding in Piraha. Edited by Mark Aronoff. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0145289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1979) From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and Syntax, (pp. 81–112). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, T.
(2006) Structural isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: the Cape as a linguistic area. In Matras, Y., McMahon, A. & Vincent, N. (Eds.), Linguistic areas: convergence in historical and typological perspective, (pp. 99–134). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, H., & Zwanziger, R.
(1984) Relatively attributive – The ‘ezafe’-construction from Old Iranian to Modern Persian. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Syntax, (pp. 137–172). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, W.
(2007) The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 53 ]
Harris, A. & Campbell, L.
(1995) Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, J. F.
(2012) Varieties of Clausal Complementation. PhD Dissertation. Massachusatts: MIT.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1998) Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language, 22(2), 49–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Grammatikalisierung: von der Performanz zur Kompetenz ohne angeborene Grammatik. In L. Hoffmann (Ed.), Sprachwissenschaft. Ein Reader, (pp. 751–773). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & König, C.
(2015) The !Xun Language. A Dialect Grammar of Northern Khoisan. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2007) The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
(2003) Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, A.
(2018) Vergleichskonstruktionen im Deutschen. Diachroner Wandel und synchrone Variation. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
(2010) Why isn’t This a complementizer?. In R. Kayne (Ed.), Comparison and Contrasts, (pp. 190–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ms. NYU). On Complementizers and Relative Pronouns in Germanic vs. Romance.
Kiparsky, P.
(1995) Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Clause structure and language change, (pp. 140–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A.
(2006) Decomposing attitude verbs. Talk presented at the workshop in honor of Anita Mittwoch. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. July 4, 2006.Google Scholar
(2016) Evidential Moods and the Semantics of Attitude and Speech Reports. Talk given at the University of Pennsylvania (May 5, 2016), the 1st Syncart Workshop (Siena, July 13, 2016), and the University of Connecticut (September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Kühnert, H., & Wagner, E. -M.
(2004) Konnektive in der diachronen Entwicklung des Jiddischen. In M. Kozianka, R. Lühr & S. Zeilfelder (Eds.), Indogermanistik – Germanistik – Linguistik. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Jena 18.-20.09.2002, (pp. 261–299). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, (pp. 181–225). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press (Classics in Linguistics, 1). Crossref
Luján, E. R.
(2009) On the grammaticalization of *kwi-/kwo relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European. In V. Bubenik, J. Hewson & S. Rose (Eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages: papers presented at the workshop on Indo-European linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007, (pp. 221–234). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Lühr, R.
(2000) Der Nebensatz und seine Konkurrenten in der Indogermania: Der altindische Relativsatz. Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics, 113, 71–87.Google Scholar
Moulton, K.
(2009) Natural selection and the syntax of clausal complementation. Doctoral dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
(2015) CPs: Copies and Compositionality. Linguistic Inquiry, 46(2), 305–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 54 ]
Narrog, H., & Heine, B.
(2011) Introduction. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohori, T.
(2011) The Grammaticalization of subordination. In: B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, (pp. 636–645). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oppermann, S.
t.a.). ‘Non-coordinating und’ in Middle and Early New High German. Journal of Historical Linguistics.
Poletto, C., & Sanfelici, E.
(2018) Demonstratives as relative pronouns: new insight from Italian varieties. In M. Coniglio et al. (Eds.), Atypical demonstratives. Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics, (pp. 95–126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Portele, Y., & Bader, M.
(2016) Accessibility and referential choice: Personal pronouns and d-pronouns in written German. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique, 18, 1–41.Google Scholar
Reich, I., Reis, M., Ehrich, V., & Fortmann, C.
(2009) Einführung. In V. Ehrich et al. (Eds.), Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen, (pp. 5–20). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Reis, M.
(1997) Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In C. Dürscheid, K. -H. Ramers & M. Schwarz (Eds.), Sprache im Fokus: Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, (pp. 121–44). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rosenplüt, H.
(1996) Der fünfmal getötete Pfarrer. In K. Grubmüller (Ed.), Novellistik des Mittelalters. Märendichtung, (pp. 898–914). Frankfurt/Main: Dt. Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Schreiber, N.
(2011) The diachronic development of complementisers in the Germanic languages. PhD Dissertation. Frankfurt/Main: Goethe-University of Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Shi, Y., & Li, C. N.
(2002) The establishment of the classifier system and the grammaticalization of the morphosyntactic particle de in Chinese. Language Sciences, 24, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E.
(2004) Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagener, T.
(2017) The History of Nordic Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walde, A., & Hofmann, J. B.
(1938) Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Erster Band A – L. 3. neubearbeitete Auflage. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Weiß, H.
(2013) Satztyp und Dialekt. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, (pp. 763–784). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016)  So welih wíb so wari. Zur Genese freier w-Relativsätze im Deutschen. In S. Neri, R. Schuhmann & S. Zeilfelder (Eds.), “Dat ih dir it nu bi huldi gibu”. Linguistische, germanistische und indogermanistische Studien Rosemarie Lühr gewidmet, (pp. 505–516). Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
(2019) Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the Early Merge Prinicple. Diachronica, 36(4), 509–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeevaert, L.
(2006) Variation und kontaktinduzierter Wandel im Altschwedischen. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Zingarelli, N.
(2010) Lo Zingarelli on-line: vocabolario della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
[ p. 55 ]