Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 38:1 (2021) ► pp. 2563
References

References

Bauman, James
1975Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Ph.D. dissertation, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Walter Bisang & Yogendra P. Yādava
1999Face vs. empathy: The social foundation of Maithili verb agreement. Linguistics 37(3): 481–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Martin Gaenszle
2015First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Gwendolyn Hyslop
2011Introduction to special issue on optional case marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi
1993Mizo syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.) Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2013The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) Languages across boundaries: Studies in the memory of Anna Siewierska, 69–93. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57 (3): 626–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52(2): 315–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta, & Janick Wrona (eds.) Nominalization in Asian languages: diachronic and typological perspectives, 343–59. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1): 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.) Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 343–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denniss, Jessica
2007Antipassives in Yukulta. In Robyn Loughnane, Cara Penry Williams, & Jana Verhoeven (eds.) In between wor(l)ds: transformation and translation, 167–81. Melbourne, Australia: School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
1997A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.) Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Driem, George van
1993The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2): 292–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H.
1991Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: evidence from Belhare, Athpare and Dungmali. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1): 73–92.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
(ed.) 2005Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, David W.
2006Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 551–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Linda B.
1994The de-transitive clauses in Bella Coola: passive vs. inverse. In Talmy Givón (ed.) Voice and inversion, 147–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zúñiga
2016Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics 54(3): 483–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1994aThe pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Talmy Givón (ed.) Voice and inversion, 65–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 1994bVoice and inversion, vol. 28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax: An introduction, 2nd edn., vol. 2. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2016Referential hierarchies and alignment: An overview. Linguistics 54(3): 433–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1991Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. In Frans Plank (ed.) Paradigms: the economy of inflection, 75–89. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Pragmatic skewing in 1↔2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2): 83–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
2014Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 301–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1972A description of the Yukulta language – an Australian Aboriginal language of North-West Queensland. M. A. thesis, Melbourne: Monash University.Google Scholar
1983Yukulta. In R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.) Handbook of Australian Languages, 3:190–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1991Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
forthcoming. On the phylogenetic status of the northwestern subbranch of South-Central (‘Kuki-Chin’): A case study in historical phonology. In Toni Huber, Stephen Morey, & Mark W. Post eds. Ethno-Linguistic Prehistory of the Eastern Himalayas Leiden Brill
Konnerth, Linda & Koninglee Wanglar
2019Person indexation in Monsang from a diachronic perspective. Himalayan Linguistics 18(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mang, Kee Shein
2006A syntactic and pragmatic description of verb stem alternation in K’Chò, a Chin language. M.A. thesis, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Payap University.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd
2001Limbu nous autres and 1st person morphology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1): 145–56.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1996New directions in referentiality. In Barbara Fox (ed.) Studies in Anaphora, 33: 413–35. Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Integrating approaches to diversity: Argument structure on the NW Coast. In Yoshiko Matsumoto, David Y. Oshima, Orrin R. Robinson, and Peter Sells (eds.) Diversity in language: perspectives and implications, 9–36. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2012Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations. In Bernard Comrie (ed.) Argument structure and grammatical relations: a crosslinguistic typology, 257–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.) Essays on language function and language type. In honor of T. Givón, 373–94. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel
2019Person indexation in Anal. Himalayan Linguistics 18(1): 26–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2003Agreement and grammatical relations in Hyow. In David Bradley, Randy J. LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky, & Graham Thurgood (eds.) Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 173–83. Canberra, Australian National University: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2017Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, & Lisa D. Travis (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Round, Erich R.
2017The Tangkic languages of Australia: Phonology and morphosyntax of Lardil, Kayardild, and Yukulta. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://​linguistics​.oxfordre​.com​/view​/10​.1093​/acrefore​/9780199384655​.001​.0001​/acrefore​-9780199384655​-e​-159
Sansò, Andrea
2017Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
2011Towards a typology of third person plural impersonals. Linguistics 49(3): 575–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–71. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Chad
1994Passive and inverse constructions. In Talmy Givón (ed.) Voice and inversion, 28: 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Deixis and alignment: Inverse systems in indigenous languages of the Americas. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar