Article published in:
Concentric
Vol. 46:2 (2020) ► pp. 240298
References

References

Arkhipov, Alexandre
2009Comitative as a cross-linguistically valid category. New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 217, ed. by Patience Epps and Alexandre Arkhipov, 223–246. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cena, Resty M.
1995Surviving without relations. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 26.1–2:1–32.Google Scholar
De Guzman, Videa P.
1978Syntactic derivation of Tagalog verbs. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 16. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
1996Lexical categories in Tagalog. Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, vol. 1, 307–321. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
De Vos, Fiona
2011Essential Tagalog Grammar: A Reference for Learners of Tagalog. Brussels, Belgium: Learning Tagalog.Google Scholar
Foley, William A.
1998Symmetrical voice systems and precategoricality in Philippine languages. Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference: Workshop on Voice and Grammatical Functions in Austronesian Languages, ed. by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 13–95. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Robert D. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frolova, Elena G.
1983 К вопросу о служебных словах ang и ay в тагальском языке [On function words ang and ay in Tagalog]. Voprosy Vostochnogo Iazykoznaniia [Topics in the Study of Oriental Languages], ed. by V. M. Alpatov, 240–246. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.Google Scholar
Gallego, Maria Kristina S.
2015 Ang mga nominal marker ng Filipino at Ivatan [Nominal markers of Filipino and Ivatan]. Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino XXI:65–95.Google Scholar
Gallego, Maria Kristina S., and Louward Allen M. Zubiri
2013Metonymy of NANG. Social Science Diliman 9.1:39–63.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1991The Philippine Challenge to Universal Grammar. Arbeitspapier Nr. 15 (Neue Folge). Köln, Germany: Institute für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
2005aTagalog. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, ed. by Alexander Adelaar and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 350–376. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005bThe Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, ed. by Alexander Adelaar and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 110–181. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, ed. by Peter Austin and Simon Musgrave, 247–293. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., and Eva F. Schultze-Berndt
2006Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, ed. by Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Eva F. Schultze-Brendt, 1–68. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Henrison
2016Distinguishing nouns and verbs: Against nominalism for Tagalog. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, ed. by Emily Clem, Virginia Dawson, Alice Shen, Amalia Horan Skilton, Geoff Bacon, Andrew Cheng and Eric Hanz Maier, 313–336. Berkley, CA: Berkley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2018Distinguishing nouns and verbs: A Tagalog case study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37.2:523–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtěch Kovář, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
2013The TenTen corpus family. Proceedings of the 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2013), ed. by Andrew Hardie and Robbie Love, 125–127. Lancaster, UK: UCREL.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2009Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35.1:1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Richlý, Pavel Smrz, and David Tugwell
2004The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress, ed. by Geoffery Williams and Sandra Vessier, 105–116. Lorient, France: Université de Bretagne Sud.Google Scholar
Klimenko, Sergei B.
2019Criteria for establishing the inventory of semantic participants and voices in Tagalog. Studies in Language 43.1:1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klimenko, Sergei B., and Divine Angeli P. Endriga
2016Semantic verb classes and regularity of voice paradigms in Tagalog. Oceanic Linguistics 55.2:483–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Karsten, and Lisa Matthewson
2009The lexical category debate in Salish and its relevance to Tagalog. Theoretical Linguistics 35.1:125–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R.
1993aAnother look at subjecthood in Tagalog. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 24.2:1–16.Google Scholar
1993bPhrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1998Nouns and verbs in Tagalog: A reply to Foley. Paper presented at the 3rd Lexical-Functional Grammar Conference, Asia SIL School, Brisbane.
2014Nominal and emphatic negation in Borneo. Advances in Research on Linguistic and Cultural Practices in Borneo (A Memorial to Peter Martin), ed. by Peter Sercombe, Michael Boutin and Adrian Clynes, 201–226. Philipps, ME: Borneo Research Council.Google Scholar
Lee, Celeste, and Loren Billings
2008Clitic-pronoun clusters in Central Philippine. Papers from the 14th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2004, SEALS XIV, vol. 1, ed. by Wilaiwan Khanittanan and Paul Sidwell, 193–203, Pacific Linguistics E-5. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian, and Yong-Min Shin
2005The functional domain of concomitance: A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. Typological Studies in Participation ( Studia Typologica 7), ed. by Christian Lehmann, 9–110. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liao, Hsiu-chuan
2011On the development of comitatitve verbs in Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 12.1:205–237.Google Scholar
Lopez, Cecilio
1950Reduplication in Tagalog. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia and Oceania 106.2:151–312.Google Scholar
Malicsi, Jonathan C.
2013Gramar ng Filipino [Filipino Grammar]. Quezon City, Philippines: Sentro ng Wikang Filipino.Google Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori
2004Depictive constructions and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Tokyo University Linguistics Papers 23:119–150.Google Scholar
2007Information structure and constituent order in Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 8.1:343–372.Google Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori, and Hyun Kyung Hwang
2018Focus and prosody in Tagalog. Perspectives on Information Structure in Austronesian Languages, ed. by Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara and Atsuko Utsumi, 375–388. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Newell, Leonard E.
1993Batad Ifugao Dictionary: With Ethnographic Notes. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Rachkov, Gennadij E.
1966 Служебное слово ay в тагальском языке [Function word ay in Tagalog]. Исследования по Филологии Стран Азии и Африки [Studies in Philology of Asian and African Countries], 89–94. Leningrad, Russia: Leningrad State University.Google Scholar
1981Введение в Морфологию Современного Тагальского Языка [Introduction to Morphology of Modern Tagalog]. Leningrad, Russia: Leningrad State University.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A.
1992On the development of the aspect system in some Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 31.1:65–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Inclusory constructions and their development in Philippine languages. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, ed. by Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley, 267–294, Pacific Linguistics 601. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A., and Hsiu-chuan Liao
2004A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 5.2:433–490.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2009Nouns, verbs, and hidden structure in Tagalog. Theoretical Linguistics 35.1:139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic or none of the above. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1977Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. Syntax and Semantics: Grammatical Relations, vol. 8, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerrold M. Sadock, 279–306. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996The subject in Tagalog: Still none of the above. UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15:1–61.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul, and Fe T. Otanes
1972Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva, and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2004Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 8:59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1988Voice in Philippine languages. Passive and Voice, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shkarban, Lina I.
1989 Порядок слов в тагальском языке [Word order in Tagalog]. Очерки Типологии Порядка Слов [Sketches on Word Order Typology], ed. by Igor’ F. Vardul’, 75–108. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1995Грамматический Строй Тагальского Языка [Tagalog Grammatical Structure]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.Google Scholar
Shkarban, Lina I., and Gennadij E. Rachkov
2007Reciprocal, sociative, and comitative constructions in Tagalog. Typology of Reciprocal Constructions, ed. by Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., 887–932. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh, and Aina Urdze
2006On Comitatives and Related Categories: A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Varieties of comitative. The Oxford Handbook of Case, ed. by Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer, 601–608. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suchomel, Vít, and Jan Pomikálek
2012Efficient web crawling for large text corpora. Proceedings of the 7th Web as Corpus Workshop, ed. by Adam Kilgarriff and Serge Sharoff, 39–43. Lyon: ACL.Google Scholar
Wolff, John U.
1973Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in Honor of Cecilio Lopez on His Seventy-fifth Birthday, LSP Special Monograph Issue No. 4, ed. by Andrew B. Gonzalez, 71–91. Quezon City, Philippines: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Zubiri, Louward Allen M.
2012It’s not what you think it is: Syntactic categories through the lens of negation. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (12-ICAL), Udayana University, Denpasar.