References

References

(Studies with asterisks are included in this synthesis)

*Ahn, S. (2012) The relationships between grammatical sensitivity, noticing of recasts, and learning of Korean objective relative clauses through conversational interaction. Applied Language Learning, 22, 47–68.Google Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
(2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2015) Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeil (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
*Baralt, M. (2010) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S.
(1959) Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
*Chen, X. (2013) Chinese EFL learners’ noticing of recasts: Its relation to target structures, uptake, and working memory capacity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
*Dai, B. (2013) Individual differences in learners’ working memory, noticing of L2 forms in recasts, and their L2 development in task-based Interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1995) Uptake as language awareness. Language Awareness, 4, 147–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Fujii, A. (2005) Individual differences in task performance: Aptitude profiles, orientation to form, and second language production in the EFL classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M.
(1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
*Goo, J. (2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G.
(2015) Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 577–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Lado, B. (2008) The role of bilingualism, type of feedback, and cognitive capacity in the acquisition of non-primary languages: A computer-based study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
*Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2008) The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70–90.Google Scholar
*Li, S. (2010) Corrective feedback in perspective: The interface between feedback type, proficiency, the choice of target structure, and learners’ individual differences in working memory and language analytic ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
(2013a) Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2). 169–198.Google Scholar
(2013b) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–342 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Cognitive differences in instructed second language acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.) Handbook of instructed second language learning (pp. 396–417). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S., Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
(2012) Doing meta-analysis in SLA: Practices, choices, and standards. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 384, 1–17.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Philp, J.
(2006) Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2004) Different effects of prompts and effects in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(2006) Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010) Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J.
(1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fuji, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2012) Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62, 704–740. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2005) Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*McMullin, J. (1988) The effects of gender and the total physical response strategy on the retention of French commands by seventh-grade black students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
*Nagata, H., Aline, D., & Ellis, R. (1999) Modified input, language aptitude, and the acquisition of word meanings. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 133–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Payne, J., & Ross, B. (2005) Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 35–54.Google Scholar
*Payne, S., & Whitney, P. (2002) Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7–32.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Révész, A. (2012) Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2002) Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.): Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Sachs, R. (2010) Individual differences and the effectiveness of visual feedback on reflexive binding in Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
*Sagarra, N. (2007) From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 230–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1994) Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Explicit and implicit learning of language (pp. 165–209). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
*Sheen, Y. (2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2012) Language aptitude. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381–395). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007) How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.): Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2015) Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Z. Wen, B. Mailce, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41–62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Winke, P.
(2005) Individual differences in adult Chinese second language acquisition: The relationships between aptitude, memory, and strategies for language learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., Çeçen, S., & Erçetin, G.
(2016) The relationship between aptitude and working memory: an instructed SLA context. Language Awareness, 25, 144–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*Yilmaz, Y. (2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G.
(2016) The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 147–161.Google Scholar
*Zhao, Y. (2015) The effects of explicit and implicit recasts on the acquisition of two grammatical structures and the mediating role of working memory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Fu, Mengxia & Shaofeng Li
2019. The associations between individual differences in working memory and the effectiveness of immediate and delayed corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2  pp. 233 ff. Crossref logo
Fu, Mengxia & Shaofeng Li
2021.  In Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning [Benjamins Current Topics, 116],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Shaofeng
2018.  In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51],  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Pawlak, Miroslaw
2020.  In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53],  pp. 52 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz, Simón, Patrick Rebuschat & Detmar Meurers
2019. The effects of working memory and declarative memory on instructed second language vocabulary learning: Insights from intelligent CALL. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216881987285 ff. Crossref logo
Wen, Zhisheng (Edward) & Peter Skehan
2021. Stages of Acquisition and the P/E Model of Working Memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 41  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.